Stubby wrote:Really? You want to play it that way?
Posting stories about gay people that 'prove' all these 'arguments'?
For every one you post, we should be able to find many more involving heterosexuals.
Absolutely! And since homosexuals make up approximately 2% of the population, there should be 49 times as many examples of heterosexual molestation as Homosexual molestation. I don't think you are going to like the results if and when you look into this.
Stubby wrote:
I mean no heterosexual man has ever, in the history of whatever Christian sect/religion, ever had an affair with an under age girl. Or conversely a woman with an underage boy. And if they did it was probably because a homosexual told them too, right?
Naw, it was a lack of control over their sexual urges, which is also a common problem amongst homosexuals.
Stubby wrote:
And while the list of references of impressive, i have no doubt the authors of that hate mongering religious whack-job website picked data to suit their religious hatred. It might be that some of the authors of the references are of the likes of Kent Novind, Ray Comfort or Ken Ham.
Most people do not even know of these people whom you mention. Only someone who seeks out this information is likely to know this, and that identifies you as a likely involved partisan. As Groucho would say, "I resemble that remark." With a name like "Stubby", no doubt you are a bottom.
Stubby wrote:
People who think they can cure homosexuality are severely deluded.
I wouldn't say "severely". There are those people who claim to have been homosexual and who now claim not to be. Given that we do not understand the condition exactly, and given that there may possibly be more than one vector responsible, it is just as presumptuous to say that a cure is impossible as it is to say that one is possible.
Stubby wrote:
What make me really sad though? Is that in that website you could replace the word homosexual with black, jew, or women and still make the same arguments.
I know that Homosexual activists have been making this claim for a very long time, and of course overlooking the fact that Blacks, in particular, Detest being compared to homosexuals. They don't see themselves as being at all similar to homosexuals, and often become quite offended when such a comparison is made.
Stubby wrote:
Let go of the hatred!
It isn't hatred, it's prudence. For most of this country's existence, Homosexuality was regarded as a form of sickness or insanity. Society had the example of Homosexual behavior from the Bible, and therefore regarded such behavior as a threat. (The City and Tribe of Benjamin were very nearly wiped out because of homosexuality.)
Given the levels of homosexual molestation of children and the large quantity of various diseases prevalent amongst so many of them, regarding them as a threat is not irrational. It is quite rational.
(And we haven't even started discussing people like John Wayne Gayce, Jeffery Dahmer, Henry Lee Lucas, and Charles Ng, just to name a few.)
‘What all the wise men promised has not happened, and what all the damned fools said would happen has come to pass.’
— Lord Melbourne —