JLawson wrote:Diogenes - I have a great deal of respect for you on this forum. However, I'm a bit concerned that you're seeing here what you really, decidedly, passionately WANT to see, not what's really in front of you. If you're invested in the idea that the cert is a fraud, then there's nothing that can be done to dissuade you of that. I've spent a lot of time handling personnel records, and I haven't seen a single thing that's out of the norm on this.Diogenes wrote: That it is an official record of the State of Hawaii, I have no doubt. That it is an official record as is expected to constitute Barack Obama's birth certificate I also have no doubt. That this is an image of an old record I have no doubt.
What I have doubts about is whether or not it is a true copy of the ORIGINAL birth certificate. Here is what I see that is peculiar about it.
1. It is obviously the image of the top of a page in a bound book. It is not a separate and individual document. It appears they have used a border of some sort to mask off the upper and lower portion of the page, as well as the opposite page.
----------
They may very well have a mask, with arrows and a notation such as "Place Book Here to Fit Birth Certificate in Proper Alignment on Security Paper." This isn't an old copy, after all.
----------
2. The masked off portion of the page is covering the exact place where the Nordyke birth certificate says:
" This certifies that the above is a True and Correct Copy of the Original Record on file in the Research, Planning and Statistics Office Hawaii State Department of Health."
.....................
That may very well have been a boilerplate taped-in place mask on the Xerox. No contemporary pic of the Xerox in question, so we'll never be able to tell, but that's what I'd do (and have done in the past) with documents that needed boilerplate phrases added to them.
.....................
3. The 2011 era rubber stamp imprint above the current directors signature says that it is a true copy of a record. It conspicuously lacks the adjective "Original." One would think it would be right under the last line on the document (as it is with the Nordyke certificate) yet that exact spot is peculiarly masked off.
.........................
If you look at the http://www.scribd.com/doc/17772843/NBC- ... ate-Photos Nordyke cert there (it's in negative, btw) you can see that the boilerplate you're looking for is flat against the xerox glass, while the book page is slightly curved. Plus, there's a slight mis-alignment between it and the certificate itself.
.........................
I suspect the Original document has been amended, and this is as close as they can come to producing a long form birth certificate without letting on that the original has been amended. I think it is no accident that the word "Original" is omitted, and that the place where it normally would be is covered up with that Anti-copy masking.
I've seen that the shading on the left side of the cert proves it's a fake. The lack of shading in the right side proves it's a fake. That there's no shading on all four sides proves it's a fake. That it doesn't look like the Nordyke cert proves it's a fake. That the Registrar's signature proves it's a fake. That the differing rubber stamp sizes proves it's a fake. That the funky signature for the registrar proves it's a fake. (If THAT was enough to prove something a fake, god help us all in the military whenever a signature's required...) That the little x's above the 'twin' and 'triplet' boxes proves it's a fake. That the X being misaligned in the 'single' box proves it's a fake, that the varying shading of the typewritten letters proves it's a fake, that the Father and mother's names being in ALL CAPS proves it's a fake. That it's on security paper proves it's fake, that the P.M. in block 5b proves it's a forgery, that the partially missing K in block 16.... you get the drift.
If you want to believe it's fake, I can't change your mind. I won't be able to, for there's no proof that'll bust your certainty that it's fake.
I believe that what you're seeing is a genuine copy. Short of seeing the original record book, I'm going to go with this. It looks real, it looks like it came from the '60s. It's not done in Microsoft Word with non-period fonts. Absent any compelling, visible (not made up or speculative) reason, as near as I can tell and as far as I'm concerned, it's the real thing.
BTW, from your 6:16 post...Sigh. As opposed to simply xeroxing the book certificate onto a sheet of security paper? Then scanning said sheet and making it into a PDF?I think someone added that green anti-copy cross hatch to the document, and made certain to obscure from view anything lower than that last visible line.
I've explained my reasons for thinking it's genuine, based on my own records handling experience. I know they won't suffice.
Sorry about that - but I simply can't beat that sort of thinking.
I'm going to make this short. I don't believe it is fake. I believe it is a copy of a real record. (except for the green cross hatching.)
I DON'T think it's an original birth certificate.