a small report from science daily but a link at the bottom was good reading
http://sites.nationalacademies.org/xped ... 081572.pdf
but no direct mention of polywell
new report from madison
-
paperburn1
- Posts: 2488
- Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 5:53 am
- Location: Third rock from the sun.
new report from madison
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 ... 114036.htm
a small report from science daily but a link at the bottom was good reading
http://sites.nationalacademies.org/xped ... 081572.pdf
but no direct mention of polywell
a small report from science daily but a link at the bottom was good reading
http://sites.nationalacademies.org/xped ... 081572.pdf
but no direct mention of polywell
I am not a nuclear physicist, but play one on the internet.
Re: new report from madison
It's about inertial confinement fusion, not inertial electrostatic confinement fusion. Why should they mention Polywell?
-
paperburn1
- Posts: 2488
- Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 5:53 am
- Location: Third rock from the sun.
Re: new report from madison
The report said Two R&D approaches are beingKitemanSA wrote:It's about inertial confinement fusion, not inertial electrostatic confinement fusion. Why should they mention Polywell?
explored: magnetic fusion energy (MFE) and inertial fusion but no mention inertial electrostatic confinement fusion , as if it was not even worth considering
I am not a nuclear physicist, but play one on the internet.
Re: new report from madison
From most people's perspective, it is not. And it seems that is how EMC2 wants it for now.