Moon landing myth busted

Point out news stories, on the net or in mainstream media, related to polywell fusion.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

krenshala
Posts: 914
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:20 pm
Location: Austin, TX, NorAm, Sol III

Post by krenshala »

Skipjack, Kiteman posted the quote with your implied question [how many imperial tons in 53Mg] right after you asked what the implied question was. ;)
Betruger wrote:
KitemanSA wrote:Nope, Falcon 27e.
27e?
27e[ngines]. Falcon 1 is one engine. Falcon 9 is nine engines exactly like the one in the Falcon 1. Falcon 9H is 27 engines. At least, it is until they start using the newer (bigger) engines.

93143
Posts: 1142
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 7:51 pm

Post by 93143 »

The Falcon 1e is the core-stretched version of the Falcon 1. Since a core stretch is necessary to get 53 tonnes out of Falcon Heavy...

Betruger
Posts: 2336
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 11:54 am

Post by Betruger »

Krenshala - Kite replied to Tom who said "Falcon 27": "Nope, 27e". So why/how contradict Falcon 27 with "27e"?

KitemanSA
Posts: 6188
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 3:05 pm
Location: OlyPen WA

Post by KitemanSA »

93143 wrote:The Falcon 1e is the core-stretched version of the Falcon 1. Since a core stretch is necessary to get 53 tonnes out of Falcon Heavy...
Ding ding ding ding ding!!! Give this man a kewpee doll!

Skipjack
Posts: 6898
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm

Post by Skipjack »

Skipjack, Kiteman posted the quote with your implied question [how many imperial tons in 53Mg] right after you asked what the implied question was.
It did not say the English tons in that, at least I did not see it.

KitemanSA
Posts: 6188
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 3:05 pm
Location: OlyPen WA

Post by KitemanSA »

Skipjack wrote: Falcon Heavy 28.5 degrees 200 km 53,000 kg
That is 53 metric tons. I always talk metric system.
Sorry, when I talk metric, I tend to use basic units , like gram (g), kilogram (kg), megagram Mg). Tonnes, or tons or however the metric derived unit is spelled is needless and confusing. A ton is and should ONLY be 2000 pounds avoirdupois. The LONG ton is and should ONLY be 20 "hundred-weight" which of course is equal to 8 stone which as everyone knows is 14 pounds avoirdupois, making a "hundred weight" 112 pounds and a long ton 2240 pounds, clear?

Or did I get that wrong?

Skipjack
Posts: 6898
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm

Post by Skipjack »

A ton is and should ONLY be 2000 pounds avoirdupois. The LONG ton is and should ONLY be 20 "hundred-weight" which of course is equal to 8 stone which as everyone knows is 14 pounds avoirdupois, making a "hundred weight" 112 pounds and a long ton 2240 pounds, clear?
Yeah, I think I am going to go back to my original attitude: I dont know how many metric tons are in an English ton or English tons are in a metric ton and I still dont care to know ;)
I always talk metric. So much easier. 1000 kg in a metric ton.

KitemanSA
Posts: 6188
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 3:05 pm
Location: OlyPen WA

Post by KitemanSA »

Skipjack wrote: I always talk metric. So much easier. 1000 kg in a metric ton.
1000 kg = 1 Mg. Easier still, and less confusion potential. :wink:

Skipjack
Posts: 6898
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm

Post by Skipjack »

1000 kg = 1 Mg. Easier still, and less confusion potential.
Oh, I agree. I never understood why they did not adopt the word Mg instead of Ton. I assume that they wanted to preserve the word ton, which I am assuming was used in measurement of mass before.

krenshala
Posts: 914
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:20 pm
Location: Austin, TX, NorAm, Sol III

Post by krenshala »

Betruger wrote:Krenshala - Kite replied to Tom who said "Falcon 27": "Nope, 27e". So why/how contradict Falcon 27 with "27e"?
Gah, I forgot about the core stretch. :( Thank you for the clarification, 93143.

krenshala
Posts: 914
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:20 pm
Location: Austin, TX, NorAm, Sol III

Post by krenshala »

Skipjack wrote:
1000 kg = 1 Mg. Easier still, and less confusion potential.
Oh, I agree. I never understood why they did not adopt the word Mg instead of Ton. I assume that they wanted to preserve the word ton, which I am assuming was used in measurement of mass before.
I think they use the term ton because 1 Mg == ~2200 lbs, which is just a bit over 1 ton. I've never seen it described as such, however, so I could easily be wrong about this (too). ;)

KitemanSA
Posts: 6188
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 3:05 pm
Location: OlyPen WA

Post by KitemanSA »

Skipjack wrote:
1000 kg = 1 Mg. Easier still, and less confusion potential.
Oh, I agree. I never understood why they did not adopt the word Mg instead of Ton. I assume that they wanted to preserve the word ton, which I am assuming was used in measurement of mass before.
In fact, according to wikipedia, they didn't. "Whoever" just used the wrong word. The culprit should have said 53 "tonnes" :)
The tonne (unit symbol t) or metric ton (U.S.),[1] often written pleonastically as metric tonne, is a unit of mass equal to 1,000 kg (2,204.62 lb) (103 kilograms). It is sometimes abbreviated to mt in the United States,[2] although this conflicts with other SI symbols. The tonne is not a unit in the International System of Units (SI), but is accepted for use with the SI.[3][4] In SI units and prefixes, the tonne is a megagram (Mg).
Hah! I told you so! ;)
:roll: :roll: :roll:

Skipjack
Posts: 6898
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm

Post by Skipjack »

1,000 kg (2,204.62 lb) (103 kilograms).
This makes no sense.
A kg is a kilogram. 1,000 kg are not 103 kilograms. I have no idea what they are talking about, but this is outright wrong!

KitemanSA
Posts: 6188
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 3:05 pm
Location: OlyPen WA

Post by KitemanSA »

Skipjack wrote:
1,000 kg (2,204.62 lb) (103 kilograms).
This makes no sense.
A kg is a kilogram. 1,000 kg are not 103 kilograms. I have no idea what they are talking about, but this is outright wrong!
Exponents don't always copy well. 1000 kg = 10³ kg.

Skipjack
Posts: 6898
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm

Post by Skipjack »

Exponents don't always copy well. 1000 kg = 10³ kg.
Ahhhhhh, yes, now it makes sense. I am stupid too, should have guessed that it was meant to read that. It is late here and I am tired, sorry.

Post Reply