I give them extra points for Milla Jovovich in the strap things. Also, "Multipass!" and the Tawdry Girl. Still, hard to call it "great." But very entertaining.Skipjack wrote:It just never really connected with me. It was OKish, but not among the best sci fi movies.Why am I not seeing "The Fifth Element" in these lists?
The top twenty science fiction movies of all time are...
I always liked "Independence Day" because it seemed plausible that the sort of militarized, genocidal society that would do what they were doing would probably also not be very good at IT security, even if their other tech was superior. Only free societies have to worry much about hackers...
n*kBolt*Te = B**2/(2*mu0) and B^.25 loss scaling? Or not so much? Hopefully we'll know soon...
A well done - meaning in-depth, richly rendered - "Mote in God's eye" would be great for that kind of culture clash.TallDave wrote:I always liked "Independence Day" because it seemed plausible that the sort of militarized, genocidal society that would do what they were doing would probably also not be very good at IT security, even if their other tech was superior. Only free societies have to worry much about hackers...
I met Jerry Pournelle a couple of years back, and he regaled us of a "Mote" story. He and Larry Niven did get some interest for a "Mote" movie, but were told that the special effects necessary to do watchmakers did not exist.
A few years back he and Larry attended another movie in which they had a CGI effect that would handle watchmakers just fine. I forget which movie it was, but the CGI spiders in one of the Harry Potter films would certainly qualify. Jerry said Larry jumped up in the middle of the theater and shouted "They can do watchmakers now!"
So maybe ... maybe.
A few years back he and Larry attended another movie in which they had a CGI effect that would handle watchmakers just fine. I forget which movie it was, but the CGI spiders in one of the Harry Potter films would certainly qualify. Jerry said Larry jumped up in the middle of the theater and shouted "They can do watchmakers now!"
So maybe ... maybe.
Independence day was a great movie, indeed. I would rank it way higher than 5th element. I was considering putting it into my top 10, but I have developed a big dislike for Roland Emmerich since ID4. All his movies afterwards were somewhat lame attempts at destroying the world even more 
That is maybe not quite fair towards ID4 though.

That is maybe not quite fair towards ID4 though.
Last edited by Skipjack on Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Loved their joint collaborations; Mote in God's eye, Lucifer's Hammer, Foot Fall, and Inferno. Also liked their books separately. They are both excellent writers.Tom Ligon wrote:I met Jerry Pournelle a couple of years back, and he regaled us of a "Mote" story. He and Larry Niven did get some interest for a "Mote" movie, but were told that the special effects necessary to do watchmakers did not exist.
A few years back he and Larry attended another movie in which they had a CGI effect that would handle watchmakers just fine. I forget which movie it was, but the CGI spiders in one of the Harry Potter films would certainly qualify. Jerry said Larry jumped up in the middle of the theater and shouted "They can do watchmakers now!"
So maybe ... maybe.
‘What all the wise men promised has not happened, and what all the damned fools said would happen has come to pass.’
— Lord Melbourne —
— Lord Melbourne —
Foot Fall is the movie I would like to see, although baby elephants might not be the best generally accepted cinematic enemy.Diogenes wrote:Loved their joint collaborations; Mote in God's eye, Lucifer's Hammer, Foot Fall, and Inferno. Also liked their books separately. They are both excellent writers.Tom Ligon wrote:I met Jerry Pournelle a couple of years back, and he regaled us of a "Mote" story. He and Larry Niven did get some interest for a "Mote" movie, but were told that the special effects necessary to do watchmakers did not exist.
A few years back he and Larry attended another movie in which they had a CGI effect that would handle watchmakers just fine. I forget which movie it was, but the CGI spiders in one of the Harry Potter films would certainly qualify. Jerry said Larry jumped up in the middle of the theater and shouted "They can do watchmakers now!"
So maybe ... maybe.
Pournelle's Janissaries would make a fun movie.
The one I see that is in development, unrelated and more fantasy than science fiction, is Dragonriders of Pern. I know it might be a little <non-masculine> of me, but this would be really cool if it gets off the ground.
That was done by Ann McCaffery, wasn't it? Never could get into her books. Andrea Norton, on the other hand, was usually awesome!seedload wrote:Foot Fall is the movie I would like to see, although baby elephants might not be the best generally accepted cinematic enemy.Diogenes wrote:Loved their joint collaborations; Mote in God's eye, Lucifer's Hammer, Foot Fall, and Inferno. Also liked their books separately. They are both excellent writers.Tom Ligon wrote:I met Jerry Pournelle a couple of years back, and he regaled us of a "Mote" story. He and Larry Niven did get some interest for a "Mote" movie, but were told that the special effects necessary to do watchmakers did not exist.
A few years back he and Larry attended another movie in which they had a CGI effect that would handle watchmakers just fine. I forget which movie it was, but the CGI spiders in one of the Harry Potter films would certainly qualify. Jerry said Larry jumped up in the middle of the theater and shouted "They can do watchmakers now!"
So maybe ... maybe.
Pournelle's Janissaries would make a fun movie.
The one I see that is in development, unrelated and more fantasy than science fiction, is Dragonriders of Pern. I know it might be a little <non-masculine> of me, but this would be really cool if it gets off the ground.
‘What all the wise men promised has not happened, and what all the damned fools said would happen has come to pass.’
— Lord Melbourne —
— Lord Melbourne —
You noticed that too? I have read few of Heinlein's later books, but one I did read was "Mark of the Beast." It started out excellent, then went completely wacko about half way through the book. The ending is straight out of crazytown.DeltaV wrote:I'd like to see a modified version of Heinlein's "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress" (one of his better works, before he went insane).
In this variant the People's Liberation Army builds and runs the lunar mass driver.
I believe a similar thing may have happened to Piers Anthony. I have completely stopped reading his books. The Tarot series, the Incarnations of Immortality series, "FireFly" and later Xanth books have convinced me that the guy has developed one or more pyschosis'.
‘What all the wise men promised has not happened, and what all the damned fools said would happen has come to pass.’
— Lord Melbourne —
— Lord Melbourne —
Yeah, that one clinched it for me too. "The Cat Who Walks Through Walls" was more of the same.Diogenes wrote:You noticed that too? I have read few of Heinlein's later books, but one I did read was "Mark of the Beast." It started out excellent, then went completely wacko about half way through the book. The ending is straight out of crazytown.
Still fond of his earlier works.
Yes, Cat was a pretty good tale until it suddenly time-warped and got mangled into an extension of Time Enough for Love, and then ended rather badly.
The saving grace of Time Enough is the intermissions, a collection of quotes from which I got my life guidance: "Specialization is for insects."
The remarkable thing about Cat from the perspective here is that the guy on this cover ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:The_C ... amazon.jpg
... looks so much like R. W. Bussard, right down to the eye patch he wore for a while after eye surgury, that I had to ask if Heinlein had used his picture. RWB denied it.
The saving grace of Time Enough is the intermissions, a collection of quotes from which I got my life guidance: "Specialization is for insects."
The remarkable thing about Cat from the perspective here is that the guy on this cover ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:The_C ... amazon.jpg
... looks so much like R. W. Bussard, right down to the eye patch he wore for a while after eye surgury, that I had to ask if Heinlein had used his picture. RWB denied it.