Giffords And The paranoid Vision of The left

Discuss life, the universe, and everything with other members of this site. Get to know your fellow polywell enthusiasts.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

Diogenes
Posts: 6976
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 3:33 pm

Post by Diogenes »

UncleMatt wrote:
Diogenes wrote:
UncleMatt wrote:By the same token, most companies are "out to take our money", so should we also think of them in a paranoid way? What are they doing with "our money"??? Does it agree with my religion/politics/personal agenda? If not, time to FREAK OUT!

rolls eyes

If you think the government is somehow the ebil debil, you are simply off your nutter. The government is made up of the same people who work in the private sector, with all the subsequent good AND bad qualities. They aren't scaled aliens bent on domination.

I disagree. As a general rule, the government is filled with incompetence; People who would be fired in the private sector. In many cases, the only reason these people can have any sort of job is because government employees are often unaccountable to anyone, least of all taxpayers.


I have personally knowledge of numerous government employees doing really stupid stuff. (County, State, City and Federal.) I would name names and incidents, but I have no desire to be sued or otherwise harassed.


Now governments sometimes manage to find people who are competent, but often they find other jobs and leave. Incompetence seems to be the rule, not the exception. The best way to reduce incompetence in government is to make it smaller.
Your attempts to make out government employees as if they were somehow a different species is entertaining, but a TOTAL fail. Government employees are motivated by the PROFIT MOTIVE, just like people in the private sector. They buy the same products, live the same lives as anyone in the private sector.

The CONSTANT attempts to paint people you may disagree with as somehow "different" or "more flawed" than everyone else is simply a good way to lose an argument based on FACTS, not the politics you choose to make your RELIGION.

Government employees are not different in their needs and wants from Private sector employees, they are different in their level of competence and their desire to order other people about.

There are not too many private sector jobs where you can tell someone else to obey you or else.

Government employees tend to be overwhelmed with their own sense of self importance, and it is more important to them that they be obeyed than that they accomplish anything objectively useful.


Let me give you a real world example.


I know a woman who got married at 15 to a 23 year old worthless bastard. He immediately moved her from her home in San Diego to a run down trailer house in a podunk town in Missouri, and had 4 children with her. He would leave her alone with the babies for weeks at a time without food, water or electricity. She had to beg the neighbors and the churches for food and water. She was starving and wasted away to 95 lbs. After 4 years of this, she told him she wanted nothing more to do with him and he was to stay away from her and the children. He waited till she left the house, grabbed all the children and took off for Kansas. He told her that she couldn't have the kids back unless she came back to him.

During this time, he filed for welfare in Kansas (he lived with one of his sisters in Kansas) and claimed that the Woman had Abandoned him and the children. The poor girl didn't know what to do, so she came to Oklahoma where her Mother and Stepfather were Living. In the meantime, the worthless bastard moves to California, where he stayed with another sister. He files for Divorce in California, Demands full custody of the children, and also demands child support from her.

She borrows whatever money she can find, (bus fare) shows up in court on the day of the hearing and is told that her Husband's lawyer postponed the hearing. Having no place to stay, she returns to Oklahoma to stay with her Mother and Step Father. She tries to come up with the money (bus fare) to show up on the NEW court date, but she can't. The Court day comes, The Judge awards the worthless bastard a default judgment and the Unemployed Young high school drop out is saddled with an enormous debt for the rest of her life.

Years later she eventually gets a job at a bingo parlor waitressing tables, and the State of Oklahoma contacts her and informs her that she must pay back child support. She shows up in court, and after hearing her story, the Judge says she got a raw deal from the legal system. The Judge then orders that she only be required to pay $300.00 per month towards child support. She specifically asks if the state will attempt to seize from her any more money than that, and the judge specifically tells her "no."

At this point, I let her and her two other children (Both from worthless bastard fathers who pay HER no child support whatsoever.) move into one of my houses rent free with the understanding that she would save what she formerly paid in rent for a down payment on her own house. After six months of this, she barely saved a thousand dollars, but I locate a small 3 bedroom house that was rent to own, and the owner agreed to accept a $1000.00 down payment and a $250.00 per month mortgage payment. (She couldn't get a bank loan, her credit was hosed.)

The very day before the sale, the State of Oklahoma seizes her bank account and STEALS her $1000.00 down payment. When contacted, they say it was for "back child support." She points out that the judge agreed to limit her responsibility to the $300.00 per month she was paying, and that they were going to wreck her chance of buying a place for herself and her children to live. They responded that they were authorized to use any means necessary to force payment for back child support!

I wrote to the Lieutenant governor Mary Fallin (now Governor) whom I knew personally from attending meetings with her and campaigning for her when she ran for Lieutenant governor, and asked her if the state had no honor? The message was intercepted by her staff, who put me in contact with the Head of DHS who explained to me that the state had every right to seize any money owned by deadbeat parents.

I explained to them that the Judge restricted their taking of her money to only that amount which was ordered, and that the agreement to garnish her wages before she received them, prevented them from garnishing her wages after she received them.

Needless to say, you might as well have been talking to a shoe. They simply could not comprehend that they had done anything wrong. In the meantime, they haven't collected one red cent from those other two bastards that fathered her two children that lived with her.


Letting her stay in my house rent free for 6 months cost me $2,400.00 in lost rent, and I GAVE her the $1,000.00 necessary to make her down payment on her own house. F*ck you very much State Bureaucrats!

In the meantime, the Father of her youngest child just inherited Two cars, a house, and a substantial sum of money after his father recently died. The state, of course, has made no effort to take any of this away from him. He DID lose his drivers license, but he drives anyway. He's a loser pot head who's fathered 4 other children with three different women, and pays none of them anything.


I have left out a lot of details that make the bureaucrats look even more stupid and misguided, but the story is too long already. Furthermore, this is Just ONE example among many that I could cite to demonstrate how utterly brainless and stupid these people are, and how they continue to make the world a worse place to live in.

The four kids she had with her first husband are all grown and have careers and children of their own, and her wages are still being garnished to pay for that worthless bastard who has not worked at a real job his entire life.
Last edited by Diogenes on Fri Jan 14, 2011 5:26 pm, edited 3 times in total.

Diogenes
Posts: 6976
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 3:33 pm

Post by Diogenes »

UncleMatt wrote:It would be refreshing if all the people who want to villify government would apply their "standards" to all the stupidity and waste that goes on in private companies. We ALL pay higher prices as a result, which takes money out of my pocket just like higher taxes do. True or false? The money is just as gone with one as it is the other...

So why the single minded focus one ONE side of the equation, but not BOTH sides?

The difference is one of COMPULSION. We do not have to patronize private companies (except where the government orders us to do so such as in requiring insurance) but we must either give up our money to the government or we will go to jail.

I do not care if Michael Jackson wanted to own a zoo and amusement park. It was his money to do with as he wished. I DO care if people who take money away from ME do something stupid with it.



Image


“I believe that every individual is naturally entitled to do as he pleases with himself and the fruits of his labor, so far as it in no way interferes with any other men’s rights” – Abraham Lincoln

UncleMatt
Posts: 66
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 7:24 pm

Post by UncleMatt »

Diogenes wrote:
UncleMatt wrote:It would be refreshing if all the people who want to villify government would apply their "standards" to all the stupidity and waste that goes on in private companies. We ALL pay higher prices as a result, which takes money out of my pocket just like higher taxes do. True or false? The money is just as gone with one as it is the other...

So why the single minded focus one ONE side of the equation, but not BOTH sides?

The difference is one of COMPULSION. We do not have to patronize private companies (except where the government orders us to do so such as in requiring insurance) but we must either give up our money to the government or we will go to jail.

I do not care if Michael Jackson wanted to own a zoo and amusement park. It was his money to do with as he wished. I DO care if people who take money away from ME do something stupid with it.



Image


“I believe that every individual is naturally entitled to do as he pleases with himself and the fruits of his labor, so far as it in no way interferes with any other men’s rights” – Abraham Lincoln
No, you are simply incorrect. You are FREE to move to ANY country you wish (for the most part) if you do not like what the government does in the U.S. No one is FORCING you to live in this country, and subsequently pay taxes in this country, true or false?

And as far as pointing out examples of waste and fraud in private companies, I guess some of you have been living in a cave with your head under a rock for the last 4 years. From giving many tens of millions of dollars in the form of bonuses to UNDESERVING executives who did NOT produce good results for their shareholders, to the many MORE millions wasted on lobbyists, its really EASY to point out the things that companies do that produce ZERO benefit for their workers and shareholders. BUT the executives make out like bandits, even as they are LEAVING the company they just screwed over.

But lets turn a blind eye to all of THAT and just pretend that its exclusively people in dat ebil gubmint that engage in waste and fraud.

People who honestly think that have been drinking the koolaid.

UncleMatt
Posts: 66
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 7:24 pm

Post by UncleMatt »

AND just think: if you applied the same standard of "transparency" to companies that so many want to apply to government, I am sure we would have a whole SLEW of NEW examples of waste and fraud to discuss...

Betruger
Posts: 2336
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 11:54 am

Post by Betruger »

Business is in it for private interests, whereas govt is supposed to be into it for everyone's benefit.

Why this isn't just platonics... E.G. There ought to be some public demand for some organism to play watchdog over private foul play. Public would then vote with their dollar for the rise or demise of such or such private firms. Private biz has no such inherent engagement to serve the public as govt does, only to propose some product that the public can buy or not buy.

"Caveat emptor"
"Volenti non fit injuria"

What's amiss in the USA is ignorance and apathy of both voters and consumers. viz how highly informative are documentaries like "Food inc.", or how little is known and reported by mainstream media and people, respectively, on e.g. Drugs; drugs' and drug laws' history, biochemistry, practical realities, etc.
This is my impression as a newcomer to American citizenship. But it's not just me who thinks so, e.g.
Turn On, Tune In, Veg Out

KitemanSA
Posts: 6188
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 3:05 pm
Location: OlyPen WA

Post by KitemanSA »

UncleMatt wrote:No, you are simply incorrect. You are FREE to move to ANY country you wish (for the most part) if you do not like what the government does in the U.S. No one is FORCING you to live in this country, and subsequently pay taxes in this country, true or false?
Said like a true sheeple.
The government doesn't own this land, the individuals do. The government is a tool used by honorable people to mediate against the worst in ourselves but is thus available to the evil ones and their "useful idiots" to mandate the worst in us.

"Government is, like fire, a dangerous servant and terrible master" This was recognized ~250 years ago when GW made that quote. Only the "useful idiots" don't recognize that now.

KitemanSA
Posts: 6188
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 3:05 pm
Location: OlyPen WA

Post by KitemanSA »

UncleMatt wrote: And as far as pointing out examples of waste and fraud in private companies, I guess some of you have been living in a cave with your head under a rock for the last 4 years. From giving many tens of millions of dollars in the form of bonuses to UNDESERVING executives who did NOT produce good results for their shareholders, to the many MORE millions wasted on lobbyists, its really EASY to point out the things that companies do that produce ZERO benefit for their workers and shareholders. BUT the executives make out like bandits, even as they are LEAVING the company they just screwed over.
Oh, you mean those conpanies that had all that money cuz some IDIOT in government stole the working man's money and gave it to them? Wow, that sure sounds like a "private" company to me! NOT!

KitemanSA
Posts: 6188
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 3:05 pm
Location: OlyPen WA

Post by KitemanSA »

UncleMatt wrote:AND just think: if you applied the same standard of "transparency" to companies that so many want to apply to government, I am sure we would have a whole SLEW of NEW examples of waste and fraud to discuss...
When did this become about "transparency"? Yet another sheeple dodge.
This is about government being too big and burdensome. This is about government VASTLY exceeding its legitimate purposes and being abused by "users" (like those "executives you griped about) for their own purposes, purposes they could never get away with were it not for their ability to mis-direct the terrible power of government.

UncleMatt
Posts: 66
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 7:24 pm

Post by UncleMatt »

Here is a question: who came to whom for a bailout recently? Did dat ebil gubmint have to go to private companies, and ask for a bailout? OR did private companies, mooching sacks in hand, coming running to get whatever the government would give them when their waste and fraud caught up with them???

Even though failure of businesses is part of capitalism?

Even though those SAME COMPANIES now want HUGE TAX BREAKS???

Even though the executives at said companies STILL Expected to get HUGE BONUSES for the incompetence they foisted on their companies? AT TAXPAYER EXPENSE?!?!?!?!

Even though those same companies have been outsourcing jobs to slave wage labor markets for decades???


Hmmm, what could the answer be...

And paying taxes is no more "theft" than paying a company for a good or service. No matter how you want to spin it, the government simply ISN'T the source of the biggest problems facing our country right now. Those are being generated by unfettered GREED in PRIVATE COMPANIES.

UncleMatt
Posts: 66
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 7:24 pm

Post by UncleMatt »

KitemanSA wrote:
UncleMatt wrote:AND just think: if you applied the same standard of "transparency" to companies that so many want to apply to government, I am sure we would have a whole SLEW of NEW examples of waste and fraud to discuss...
When did this become about "transparency"? Yet another sheeple dodge.
This is about government being too big and burdensome. This is about government VASTLY exceeding its legitimate purposes and being abused by "users" (like those "executives you griped about) for their own purposes, purposes they could never get away with were it not for their ability to mis-direct the terrible power of government.
I mentioned transparency because people on the right keep acting like its a "must have" for government, but NOT for private companies. Those standards need to be applied TO ALL and not just the government.

Betruger
Posts: 2336
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 11:54 am

Post by Betruger »

Those CEO dirtbags had a Vulcan mind grip on the govt. :lol: The solution to fusion researchers' funding woes was so simple all along...

KitemanSA
Posts: 6188
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 3:05 pm
Location: OlyPen WA

Post by KitemanSA »

UncleMatt wrote:Here is a question: who came to whom for a bailout recently? Did dat ebil gubmint have to go to private companies, and ask for a bailout? OR did private companies, mooching sacks in hand, coming running to get whatever the government would give them when their waste and fraud caught up with them???
Of course they did, cuz they couldn't get the money thru force from the people as a private company, they needed to have the gov'mt steal the working man's money for them.

Are you so silly as to think we don't understand that there are "user" type people in all walks of life? Of course there are. But a "free enterprise" user is called a thief or a con-man and is put into jail whenever convicted. Government enterprise "user" types are called politicians and steal and extort and defraud safely from behind the mask of "helping you".

The most terrifying words in the American Language... "I'm from the government and I'm here to help".

And oh by the way, those "private" users you've been talking about work behind the mask of a government fiction called a "corporation" which is the very definition of lack of responsibility. "Corporations" ARE government creations. Is it any wonder thay have the faults of government?

I don't talk "private", I talk "free entersprise". Enterprise can be free and it can be fixed by government meddling. Corporations are the latter.

Diogenes
Posts: 6976
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 3:33 pm

Post by Diogenes »

UncleMatt wrote:AND just think: if you applied the same standard of "transparency" to companies that so many want to apply to government, I am sure we would have a whole SLEW of NEW examples of waste and fraud to discuss...

You have a disconnect from reality. What a company wastes is none of your concern, just as it is no concern of your whether your neighbor throws a lot of food away or not.

Fraud is a criminal matter, and should be handled in accordance with the law.


Why on earth would you think it is any business of yours what a private company (or citizen) does with it's/their money? The only people they have to answer to are the people who patronize their business, which is an entirely voluntary affair.

Diogenes
Posts: 6976
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 3:33 pm

Post by Diogenes »

UncleMatt wrote:
Diogenes wrote:
UncleMatt wrote:It would be refreshing if all the people who want to villify government would apply their "standards" to all the stupidity and waste that goes on in private companies. We ALL pay higher prices as a result, which takes money out of my pocket just like higher taxes do. True or false? The money is just as gone with one as it is the other...

So why the single minded focus one ONE side of the equation, but not BOTH sides?

The difference is one of COMPULSION. We do not have to patronize private companies (except where the government orders us to do so such as in requiring insurance) but we must either give up our money to the government or we will go to jail.

I do not care if Michael Jackson wanted to own a zoo and amusement park. It was his money to do with as he wished. I DO care if people who take money away from ME do something stupid with it.



Image


“I believe that every individual is naturally entitled to do as he pleases with himself and the fruits of his labor, so far as it in no way interferes with any other men’s rights” – Abraham Lincoln


No, you are simply incorrect. You are FREE to move to ANY country you wish (for the most part) if you do not like what the government does in the U.S. No one is FORCING you to live in this country, and subsequently pay taxes in this country, true or false?

I was born here. This is my home. You are telling me that when rabble come into my home and shit, I am perfectly free to leave my home if I object to the shit. I do not have another home. I think the better solution is to rub the rabble's face in the shit and make THEM leave MY home.


UncleMatt wrote: And as far as pointing out examples of waste and fraud in private companies, I guess some of you have been living in a cave with your head under a rock for the last 4 years. From giving many tens of millions of dollars in the form of bonuses to UNDESERVING executives who did NOT produce good results for their shareholders, to the many MORE millions wasted on lobbyists, its really EASY to point out the things that companies do that produce ZERO benefit for their workers and shareholders. BUT the executives make out like bandits, even as they are LEAVING the company they just screwed over.

But lets turn a blind eye to all of THAT and just pretend that its exclusively people in dat ebil gubmint that engage in waste and fraud.

D@mn right lets turn a blind eye to that! It's none of our d@mn business what people do with THEIR own money. It IS our business what our government does with OUR money.

If you have a difficult time comprehending the difference between the meaning of the words THEIR and OUR, then you need to find a simpleton forum to argue in.

Diogenes
Posts: 6976
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 3:33 pm

Post by Diogenes »

UncleMatt wrote:Here is a question: who came to whom for a bailout recently? Did dat ebil gubmint have to go to private companies, and ask for a bailout? OR did private companies, mooching sacks in hand, coming running to get whatever the government would give them when their waste and fraud caught up with them???

You mean like Unionized GM, or Democrat Financial Companies? Yeah, they should have been left to die. The world would be a better place if those companies had gotten what they deserved. GM especially.

The Financial Companies were less at fault for their own problems than GM. Freddie Mac and Fanny Mae (government controlled organizations) pretty much screwed the Financial companies to the wall, so in that regard, the government sort of SHOULD be responsible for cleaning up that mess, and by Government I mean only the Democrats. No one else though giving loans to people who were bad credit risks was a good idea.

UncleMatt wrote: Even though failure of businesses is part of capitalism?
Absolutely. They should have been allowed to fail. The fact that they weren't implies a sort of fascism at work.

UncleMatt wrote: Even though those SAME COMPANIES now want HUGE TAX BREAKS???

Even though the executives at said companies STILL Expected to get HUGE BONUSES for the incompetence they foisted on their companies? AT TAXPAYER EXPENSE?!?!?!?!

You need to take that up with the assh@le that decided to give them government money. You know, the Current Precedent. If they hadn't contributed so much money to him, he probably would have let them fail.


UncleMatt wrote: Even though those same companies have been outsourcing jobs to slave wage labor markets for decades???


What companies are you talking about? The ones that got bailout money? Didn't know any of the financial companies were using third world slave labor accountants. Seems pretty unlikely that they would trust billions with people making a dollar a day.

Perhaps you are talking about GM? (A Massive benefit payment organization with a money losing sideline of manufacturing cars.)
GM's problem is that they don't outsource ENOUGH jobs oversees! Getting rid of the burden of the parasitic Union workers is the only way that company has a hope of surviving.

UncleMatt wrote: Hmmm, what could the answer be...

And paying taxes is no more "theft" than paying a company for a good or service. No matter how you want to spin it, the government simply ISN'T the source of the biggest problems facing our country right now. Those are being generated by unfettered GREED in PRIVATE COMPANIES.


This is simple. The government has an obligation to perform certain specific tasks, and the people have an obligation to contribute taxes to support these necessary and specific tasks.

However, money in excess of that required to perform the specific and enumerated tasks that our government was created for is illegal, and the taking of it constitutes theft.

Greed in private companies does not concern me. Greed and theft in government concerns everyone who contributes money to it.

Post Reply