Collisions till Fusion? - DONE

Discuss how polywell fusion works; share theoretical questions and answers.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

KitemanSA
Posts: 6188
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 3:05 pm
Location: OlyPen WA

Post by KitemanSA »

I am still totally confused.

Chris,
Would you PLEASE edit my statement so that it states what you think it should state? If I presumed incorrectly about the fuel/energy for your 1E8, please state what it was. If you want to give the number equivalent to 1E8 for pB11 @550keV, please do. Either way is fine with me.

Thank you.

TallDave
Posts: 3152
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 7:12 pm
Contact:

Post by TallDave »

Also, in relation to neutrals -- even if Bussard was way off on the ionization times, I don't think you can have neutrals in the WB area for very long, just because they aren't confined by anything (unlike ions and electrons, which are confined both by each other and the magnetic field). Any neutrals that don't get ionized at startup are going to head for the area of 1e4x lower pressure outside the WB like water in a sponge being squeezed (the hand confines the sponge, but not the water).
n*kBolt*Te = B**2/(2*mu0) and B^.25 loss scaling? Or not so much? Hopefully we'll know soon...

KitemanSA
Posts: 6188
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 3:05 pm
Location: OlyPen WA

Post by KitemanSA »

There is no simple answer to this question, answers being dependant on the assumptions made when answering it. Generally knowledgable individuals have provided answers from as low as 60 [1] to as high as 1E8 [2] for pB11 at ~550keV. The lower presumes an effective cross section that produces a 90 degree RMS scattering, while the larger includes each and every glancing interaction.

[1] http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/f ... /5375/307a
[2] viewtopic.php?p=40472&highlight=#40472
The above answer is now inserted in the FAQ. At this point, this topic is done. If you want to make further comments, either PM me directly or start a new topic please.

Post Reply