Novels you have re-read several times
I've always felt that reading fiction was a waste of time when there was so much to learn about the world from factual books with real information in.
I am still undecided whether I have lost out from that, though I tend to think this is a typical *extreme engineer's* trait as it is common with some other types like me that I know.
I have studied Julius Caesar and The Hobbit at school. I really liked the Shakespear stuff actually, there is a certain 'designed connectivity' within the character structures of these plays that I think has an appeal to system engineers. Hobbit - blah blah nonsense....
The only other book I have read cover to cover was Frøken Smillas fornemmelse for sne [resorting to an english translation - I'm not very accomplished with languages]. (Well, if one has an ex Nordic sailing champion as a girlfriend and she says "read this, I think it's great" then, in the bigger scheme of things, it's not really an option not to, is it!?)
I am still undecided whether I have lost out from that, though I tend to think this is a typical *extreme engineer's* trait as it is common with some other types like me that I know.
I have studied Julius Caesar and The Hobbit at school. I really liked the Shakespear stuff actually, there is a certain 'designed connectivity' within the character structures of these plays that I think has an appeal to system engineers. Hobbit - blah blah nonsense....
The only other book I have read cover to cover was Frøken Smillas fornemmelse for sne [resorting to an english translation - I'm not very accomplished with languages]. (Well, if one has an ex Nordic sailing champion as a girlfriend and she says "read this, I think it's great" then, in the bigger scheme of things, it's not really an option not to, is it!?)
Last edited by chrismb on Fri Jan 29, 2010 11:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Some books in the Perry Rhodan novel series. One of the authors was a physicist and the first books were- for the early sixties- quite solid science fiction. E.g. Perry Rhodan's (an american and the first human to land on the moon) moon rocket had a NERVA style engine. They actually envisioned every modern plane of the early seventies (when Rhodan lands on the moon in their vision of the future) to be powered by nuclear engines.
Of course there are also all sorts of aliens and hyper space jumps and all that not so down to earth stuff. They were the first (that I know of) to have star trek like transporters (called transmitters) and impulse engines described technically in a sci fi story too.
Anyway, I liked it for their descriptions of the world reaching for the stars (the first space port and so on).
Of course there are also all sorts of aliens and hyper space jumps and all that not so down to earth stuff. They were the first (that I know of) to have star trek like transporters (called transmitters) and impulse engines described technically in a sci fi story too.
Anyway, I liked it for their descriptions of the world reaching for the stars (the first space port and so on).
Anne McCafferey's Pern books (as well as most of her SF, especially Restoree).
Various Heinlein (particularly Number of the Beast and Time Enough for Love (I especially like Lazarus' notes: they've probably been my biggest influence)).
Marion Zimmer Bradley's Darkover and Survivor series.
Doom (yes, the game became a series of four books: surprisingly good).
Several of HM Hoover's books (particularly "This time of Darkness").
John Brunner's "Crucible of Time" is excellent. Makes AGW look like a storm in a teacup
.
Poul Anderson's "Starfarers".
Robert F Young's "Eridahn" (probably a favorite, but I've only just found it again)
I've read many others (Herbert, Tolkien, Hubbard (
), some Shakespeare), to the point I can't remember them all.
Adding to that, I've also read (as in finished) and enjoyed 精霊の守人 and フルメタルパニック (first book). Reading Japanese is still a bit of a chore, though.
Various Heinlein (particularly Number of the Beast and Time Enough for Love (I especially like Lazarus' notes: they've probably been my biggest influence)).
Marion Zimmer Bradley's Darkover and Survivor series.
Doom (yes, the game became a series of four books: surprisingly good).
Several of HM Hoover's books (particularly "This time of Darkness").
John Brunner's "Crucible of Time" is excellent. Makes AGW look like a storm in a teacup

Poul Anderson's "Starfarers".
Robert F Young's "Eridahn" (probably a favorite, but I've only just found it again)
I've read many others (Herbert, Tolkien, Hubbard (

Adding to that, I've also read (as in finished) and enjoyed 精霊の守人 and フルメタルパニック (first book). Reading Japanese is still a bit of a chore, though.
Franz Kafka (The Trial, The Castle, I'm trying to find a copy of Amerika), Herman Hesse (Steppenwolf), Walter Tevis (The Man Who Fell to Earth), Everything by Edgar Allen Poe and H.P. Lovecraft, Arthor C. Clarke (Glidepath), Ray Bradbury (Farhenheit 451), Auldous Huxley (Brave New World). Movies- THX1138, Rollerball(original), A Clockwork Orange, Deathrace 2000(Original), TV- The Prisoner Series(original). Comix-Heavy Metal.
CHoff
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 5:22 pm
without looking, Heinlein? The one with nazis on the moon? Have spacesuit will travel? Or was that clear skies? and the reply was... cool jets? clear flying? IDKpassenger66 wrote:No peeking, which novel is it?
"Blue sky!" shouts Chris.
What is the difference between ignorance and apathy? I don't know and I don't care.
OK, I looked. Man, I was way off...pfrit wrote:without looking, Heinlein? The one with nazis on the moon? Have spacesuit will travel? Or was that clear skies? and the reply was... cool jets? clear flying? IDKpassenger66 wrote:No peeking, which novel is it?
"Blue sky!" shouts Chris.
What is the difference between ignorance and apathy? I don't know and I don't care.
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 5:22 pm
I owned it as a teenager. I won't say the name of the book because I did look.passenger66 wrote:The author says:
"Although much has been changed for rhetorical purposes, it must be regarded in its essence as fact."
In the text he uses the description for his text: "Chautauqua".
Perhaps I was being misleading to call it a novel.
What is the difference between ignorance and apathy? I don't know and I don't care.
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 5:22 pm
-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 9:12 pm
- Location: Michigan
-
- Posts: 526
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 7:19 am