Does a dodecahedron really meet Bussard's requirements?

Discuss the technical details of an "open source" community-driven design of a polywell reactor.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

drmike
Posts: 825
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 11:54 pm
Contact:

Post by drmike »

That's why I want to model the plasma. The whole system is way too complicated. It's possible to think about one section at a time, but the whole system interacts with every part of itself continuously and it's not so easy to figure out what the effects of each subsection of the problem will be. It will be interesting to see how the models behave depending on the assumptions made.

TallDave
Posts: 3152
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 7:12 pm
Contact:

Post by TallDave »

Yeah, we haven't even mentioned the beam-bunching yet.

scareduck
Posts: 552
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 5:03 am

Post by scareduck »

I finally found a clue about what Bussard was talking about in one of his earliest papers (PDF). On page 6 he shows what he means by a truncated cube, and that indeed would provide the geometry he specified.

drmike
Posts: 825
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 11:54 pm
Contact:

Post by drmike »

Excellent find! The remarks on the polyhedral currents come from a French reference from 1966 (ref 14). Completely different thought process than where I was coming from, so this helps a lot.

Stefan
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 9:49 am

Post by Stefan »

In the "Should Google Go Nuclear" pdf at askmar.com there's a picture of some single-turn devices emc2 used to test the polyhedron concept, look on page 14.
I think it was also shown in the video.

They are also mentioned in the IAC paper on page 10, but there isn't a picture.

drmike
Posts: 825
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 11:54 pm
Contact:

Post by drmike »

Ah ha! I missed the meaning of that totally the first time through. Thanks Stefan!

scareduck
Posts: 552
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 5:03 am

Post by scareduck »

The pictures are available in the askmar.com PDF transcript of the Google video.

TallDave
Posts: 3152
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 7:12 pm
Contact:

Post by TallDave »

Good find!

The pic on page 6 really makes it clear why you need an even number of faces around each vertex.

Post Reply