Dated Jan 8,
https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity ... =1&au=&ck=
More WB-7 Research
Actually, they may be. If they advertised for a NEW unit (WB8) they would have a much tougher time doing a sole source. Note that I don't actually believe they ARE going on to WB8, but I would be HUGELY pleased to be wrong on this one!zbarlici wrote:"....contract for modification and testing of plasma wiffleball 7."
...
Not going ahead with the WB-8 thou....

PS: Does anyone have the ability to get the auto updates on this one? I haven't seen ANY financials from any of the past pre-solicitations either. Were the 10k? Were they 200k? I don't know. Does anyone?
An ion gun, some instrumentation, and now some funds to fire up WB-7 again, and make some measurements, I would presume.
Being able to compare WB-7 (puffing gas) to WB-7 (w/ion gun) should be worthwhile, and if it hasn't been done yet, better/measurements of where the neutrons come from. BB or BG.
This might mean the ion gun is finished and now will be installed.... ?
Being able to compare WB-7 (puffing gas) to WB-7 (w/ion gun) should be worthwhile, and if it hasn't been done yet, better/measurements of where the neutrons come from. BB or BG.
This might mean the ion gun is finished and now will be installed.... ?

I like the p-B11 resonance peak at 50 KV acceleration. In2 years we'll know.