

(From http://www.polyhedra.jp/polyhedron/js/zindex.html )
The coils for these arrangements interfere if you try to fold them...


Dan...D Tibbets wrote:As an exercise in geometry, this may be interesting. But for a real reactor it is ,um, meaningless. Keep in mind that each magnet face is a separate assembly that has to have cooling plumbing, power leads, structural supports (against the powerful repulsion between all magnets, a robust and cooled vacuum vessel, etc.
Dan Tibbets
Ummm, no it doesn't need to be. Remember the MPG.D Tibbets wrote:Keep in mind that each magnet face is a separate assembly that has to have cooling plumbing, power leads, structural supports (against the powerful repulsion between all magnets, a robust and cooled vacuum vessel, etc.
I assume that you are referring to N vs S directions. Yes, the facet arrangement will need to allow all inward (or outward) poles (even if with the expense of intercoil gaps and "funny" cusps). But the general idea of rapid rotational compression has a certain steam-punk appeal for pulsed operation.KitemanSA wrote:Well, the first one won't work.