viable alternative source of energy compared to ITER
viable alternative source of energy compared to ITER
Like ITER, my idea is certainly possible! Instead of using a gigantic aircraft carrier sized building full of intense scientific instruments and gyrotron do dads, considerable cost savings can be attained by powering a steam turbine using orignal Picasso paintings as fuel. Yes the fuel would be kind of expensive however the emissions are pretty good and not only that, but it doesn't take a giant technological monster to make it work. By burning up Picasso we can finally attain true energy freedom!
Re: viable alternative source of energy compared to ITER
Pigassos are more numerous and renewable.ohiovr wrote:Like ITER, my idea is certainly possible! Instead of using a gigantic aircraft carrier sized building full of intense scientific instruments and gyrotron do dads, considerable cost savings can be attained by powering a steam turbine using orignal Picasso paintings as fuel. Yes the fuel would be kind of expensive however the emissions are pretty good and not only that, but it doesn't take a giant technological monster to make it work. By burning up Picasso we can finally attain true energy freedom!
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.
Re: viable alternative source of energy compared to ITER
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.