You miss the point.Skipjack wrote:Yeah, because this is the first administration where mistakes like these were made by the army...
Also, Obama does not sign off on the information given to the press. Sorry guys, not a huge fan of Obama, but this is ridiculous.
The top guy sets the game rules for everyone below. This mistake is a symptom of the professional climate within the Executive Office. Just as it would be anywhere it happened. That climate is created and mantained by the boss. Period.
That is why bosses are responsible for the actions of their people.
Am I saying Obama is personally at fault and maliciously released the name. No.
What I am saying is that he created conditions for it to happen. And HE must fix them immediately (too late...) in order to ensure the message gets across. The "everyone is a winner, we all make mistakes" mentality does not cut it when you are messing with people's lives.
Dragging in what the army did is irrelevant. Obamainc could have stopped the release if they were in the game, even just a little.
I say again, it was a hack mistake by a group of hacks.
I also say again that someone in the army will be held to task for their part. The only way that wouldn't happen is if they passed the list on the proper systems with the proper protocals and Obamainc spilled it.
I would find it very hard to believe that someone on the army side would list the Station Chief in an UNCLASS format. If they did, it probably came from State that way, they added the army names and passed it on is my guess.
But again, irrelevant to the Obamainc error and responsibility.
Your argument revolves around the idea that if the guy in front of you runs over and kills someone, it is okay for you to do it, because he already did and the guy is already dead. That is silly, and you are wrong.