The book mentioned in the above article:UNTIL the last third of the nineteenth century, when it was criminalized state by state across the land, abortion was legal before "quickening" (approximately the fourth month of pregnancy). Colonial home medical guides gave recipes for "bringing on the menses" with herbs that could be grown in one's garden or easily found in the woods. By the mid eighteenth century commercial preparations were so widely available that they had inspired their own euphemism ("taking the trade"). Unfortunately, these drugs were often fatal. The first statutes regulating abortion, passed in the 1820s and 1830s, were actually poison-control laws: the sale of commercial abortifacients was banned, but abortion per se was not. The laws made little difference. By the 1840s the abortion business -- including the sale of illegal drugs, which were widely advertised in the popular press -- was booming. The most famous practitioner, Madame Restell, openly provided abortion services for thirty-five years, with offices in New York, Boston, and Philadelphia and traveling salespeople touting her "Female Monthly Pills."
In one of the many curious twists that mark the history of abortion, the campaign to criminalize it was waged by the same professional group that, a century later, would play an important role in legalization: physicians. The American Medical Association's crusade against abortion was partly a professional move, to establish the supremacy of "regular" physicians over midwives and homeopaths. More broadly, anti-abortion sentiment was connected to nativism, anti-Catholicism, and, as it is today, anti-feminism. Immigration, especially by Catholics and nonwhites, was increasing, while birth rates among white native-born Protestants were declining. (Unlike the typical abortion patient of today, that of the nineteenth century was a middle- or upper-class white married woman.) Would the West "be filled by our own children or by those of aliens?" the physician and anti-abortion leader Horatio R. Storer asked in 1868. "This is a question our women must answer; upon their loins depends the future destiny of the nation." (It should be mentioned that the nineteenth-century women's movement also opposed abortion, having pinned its hopes on "voluntary motherhood" -- the right of wives to control the frequency and timing of sex with their husbands.)
http://www.theatlantic.com/past/issues/ ... ortion.htm
When Abortion Was a Crime: Women, Medicine, and Law in the United States, 1867-1973
===
A book from the right to life perspective (and an excerpt from a review):
===The theme of the book up to its last chapter is to acknowledge what most of the movement people don't do - namely the consistently widespread availability of abortion everywhere among all social and economic classes. It also acknowledges that the passage of the first anti-abortion laws in the 19th century had little affect.
Abortion Rites: A Social History of Abortion in America
From a pro-life site:
I always found that odd. The woman makes a decision to have an abortion and yet she is never the object of punishment. I discuss the oddity of that at:Who was punished?
Abortionists, if convicted, were sent to jail for varying lengths of time. There is no record of any having been executed.
Were women punished?
The definitive study on this gives the lie to Planned Parenthood’s ads which claimed: "If you had a miscarriage you could be prosecuted for murder." Washington Post April 27, 1981
Studying two hundred years of legal history, the American Center for Bioethics concluded: "No evidence was found to support the proposition that women were prosecuted for undergoing or soliciting abortions. The charge that spontaneous miscarriages could result in criminal prosecution is similarly insupportable. There are no documented instances of prosecution of such women for murder or for any other species of homicide; nor is there evidence that states that had provisions enabling them to prosecute women for procuring abortions ever applied those laws. The vast majority of the courts were reluctant to implicate women, even in a secondary fashion, through complicity and conspiracy charges. Even in those rare instances where an abortionist persuaded the court to recognize the woman as his accomplice, charges were not filed against her. In short, women were not prosecuted for abortions. Abortionists were. The charges of Planned Parenthood and other "pro-choice" proponents are without factual basis. Given the American legal system’s reliance on precedent, it is unlikely that enforcement of future criminal sanctions on abortion would deviate substantially from past enforcement patterns." Women and Abortion, Prospects of Criminal Charges Monograph, American Center for Bioethics, 422 C St., NE, Washington, DC 20002, Spring 1983
http://www.mcadamreport.org/Abortion.html
The Penalty For Abortion Should Be
The Jewish position on abortion:
The Jewish Position On Abortion
The Jews And Partial Birth Abortion
==================
Now what is the fear of at least some of those those who oppose general laws against abortion?
Vagina Police
Which is to say a police state similar to that which has evolved to enforce Drug Prohibition
==================
So what is the result of our current relatively liberal abortion policies?
The abortion rate just hit an all-time low
Huge Abortion Rate Decline Shows Pro-Life Progress
And all done without a law. I wonder if we couldn't solve other social problems by social pressure instead of government? It would at least have the advantage of being cheaper and reducing the need for police.
===========
So liberals are having more abortions than conservatives?Mississippi had the lowest abortion rate, at 4 per 1,000 women of child-bearing age. The state also had only a couple of abortion providers, and has the nation's highest teen birth rate. New York was highest, with abortion rates roughly eight times higher than Mississippi's.
U.S. abortion rates down 5 percent during Great Recession, biggest one-year decrease in a decade
Abortion rates in conservative states lower than in liberal states says Dr Michal J New PH.D. in Political Science from Stanford University
You would think conservatives would applaud that, given that the politics of children closely correlates with the politics of the parents.