Big Gov's "A" Game
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: Big Gov's "A" Game
I'm going with Chinese commie.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
Re: Big Gov's "A" Game
Nobody expects the spamish inquisition.
Re: Big Gov's "A" Game
Around here, last few days, seems like more of that than anything else.Jccarlton wrote:Nobody expects the spamish inquisition.
The daylight is uncomfortably bright for eyes so long in the dark.
Re: Big Gov's "A" Game
I have to ask myself, "what were they thinking?"
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government ... -insurance
Voting to screw 20 million potential voters? That was really stupid.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government ... -insurance
Voting to screw 20 million potential voters? That was really stupid.
Re: Big Gov's "A" Game
The bigger this gets, the worse it looks:
http://www.cnbc.com/id/101164217
This is the problem with 20th Century thinking that didn't work in the 20th century.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/101164217
This is the problem with 20th Century thinking that didn't work in the 20th century.
Re: Big Gov's "A" Game
Don't follow the old paradigms:
Here's why Obamacare was doomed to fail:
http://www.aei-ideas.org/2013/10/heres- ... d-to-fail/
Here's why Obamacare was doomed to fail:
http://www.aei-ideas.org/2013/10/heres- ... d-to-fail/
Re: Big Gov's "A" Game
Two possibilities come to mind:Jccarlton wrote:I have to ask myself, "what were they thinking?"
- they weren't thinking.
- they were thinking they could deflect the blame on someone else.
The daylight is uncomfortably bright for eyes so long in the dark.
Re: Big Gov's "A" Game
I guess they if they fooled enough people for just long enough they could make it work:
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB1 ... 3213243280
The problem is that they are playing the politics of scarcity in climate of abundance. And limiting peoples choice when they were making the best decision for themselves.
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB1 ... 3213243280
The problem is that they are playing the politics of scarcity in climate of abundance. And limiting peoples choice when they were making the best decision for themselves.
Re: Big Gov's "A" Game
I think that this comes under the pattern of no Sh!t Sherlock:
http://thelead.blogs.cnn.com/2013/11/04 ... ?hpt=hp_t2
They didn't seem to understand that this wasn't some shopping "experience." This was about trying to make the correct life choices.
http://thelead.blogs.cnn.com/2013/11/04 ... ?hpt=hp_t2
They didn't seem to understand that this wasn't some shopping "experience." This was about trying to make the correct life choices.
Re: Big Gov's "A" Game
The more I look at the healthcare debacle, the more I ask myself, "what were they thinking?"
http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/11/ ... vices.html
I don't think that this war on the middle class is going to end well.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/11/ ... vices.html
I don't think that this war on the middle class is going to end well.
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: Big Gov's "A" Game
Jccarlton wrote:
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
Re: Big Gov's "A" Game
Of course nobody told the boss the cluster f*ck that was happening to his "signature" legislation.:
http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/201 ... more-32856
This house of cards is doomed:
http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/201 ... more-32833
The problem with overconstrained systems is that they don't have the flexibility to resolve themselves to the real world. The more complicated and bigger the system the looser the coupling have to be for the system to function at all.
The Wheels have come off this turkey:
http://pjmedia.com/eddriscoll/2013/11/0 ... obamacare/
http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/201 ... more-32856
This house of cards is doomed:
http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/201 ... more-32833
The problem with overconstrained systems is that they don't have the flexibility to resolve themselves to the real world. The more complicated and bigger the system the looser the coupling have to be for the system to function at all.
The Wheels have come off this turkey:
http://pjmedia.com/eddriscoll/2013/11/0 ... obamacare/
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: Big Gov's "A" Game
Still sounds like anti-democracy, anti-freedom rhetoric propaganda about how we need Mao to tell us all what to do.
I got bad news. This is the US. We don't do personality cults the way y'all do. Too independent.
I got bad news. This is the US. We don't do personality cults the way y'all do. Too independent.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
Re: Big Gov's "A" Game
Big Government failing in real time:
http://lfb.org/today/blinding-you-with- ... ign=Buffer
http://lfb.org/today/blinding-you-with- ... ign=Buffer
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: Big Gov's "A" Game
Problem being you're not proposing anything different. Just the same with you in charge.
Typical.
Typical.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.