If you want to disagree, OK, but please don't lie.

[TDPerk]

Hey JCarlton, this guy is more fun than I thought.

I should have poked him before.

[Schneibster]

Only if you're innumerate.

[TDPerk]

I'm an engineer.

I NEVER get to lie.

I'm peer reviewed by reality.

[Schneibster]

I'm an engineer.

I NEVER get to lie.

I'm peer reviewed by reality.

Well, unfortunately you claimed I said something I didn't say, and it looks like you're sufficiently stupid you don't know another vector of attack and are spamming on this one.

You lied. I never said it. It's that simple. Stop lying.

[JLawson]

This is a determination of whether you suffer from delusions or not.

A determination? What is this - a tribunal to determine guilt or innocence?

(Looks around...) Funny, this doesn't look like a courtroom - or even a place where there's a need to 'determine' whether someone suffers delusions or not.

And who the hell are you to pass judgement in the first place - and why should we accept your conclusions, aside from the delusions of grandeur you seem to harbor that make you believe you're an infallible arbiter of who 'lies' and who doesn't - and are willing to apparently spam the boards like nobody's business to make sure YOUR malignant opinion should prevail?

Based on what I've seen, I wouldn't trust you to diagnose a zit, much less prescribe treatment. Your 'determination' is worthless.

[Schneibster]

Then post a link and a quote.

You're just joining the lie.

Assuming you're not just another sockpuppet.

[TDPerk]

"Well, unfortunately you claimed I said something I didn't say"

Which you can't quote, 'cause it never happened.

[Schneibster]

Already linked and quoted.

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=4895&start=15#p107153

You are spamming us with fairy tales about how human released CO2 is somehow different from other CO2

You said it, you deny it, you're lying. Period.

I never spammed, I never told fairy tales, and I never claimed there are different kinds of CO2[sic], as you call it, other than varieties due to atomic isotopes. You have been repeatedly challenged to provide quotes and links to the contrary and failed. After so many attempted denials it is fair to assume you lied.

[TDPerk]

Where are you pretending I said you said it it? I said you are spamming us with fairy tales about how human released CO2 is different from natural CO2.

That's true.

It is the basis of the AGW theory you're flacking, the notion there are gains to human released CO2 never before seen in history or the archeological record.

[Schneibster]

Here:

You are spamming us with fairy tales about how human released CO2 is somehow different from other CO2

I never said this. You are lying.

Here's the link:

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=4895&start=15#p107153

Not responsible for your editing.

[TDPerk]

" You are lying."

How am I lying?

To be valid, AGW requires gains in global temperature unique to human released CO2 never seen in history or geology with any other such concentration of CO2 or it's increase.

Are you flacking AGW without understanding it in the slightest?

God you're dumb.

[Schneibster]

You lied about what I said.

You are dishonorable.

I defecate upon your elders.

[TDPerk]

"You lied about what I said. "

Not once yet.

"I defecate upon your elders."

Oh yeah?

And I fart in your general direction.

[Schneibster]

Quote and link or you lie.

[Schneibster]

Here's mine:

You are spamming us with fairy tales about how human released CO2 is somehow different from other CO2,

This is an outright lie. You said it here: viewtopic.php?f=8&t=4895&start=15#p107153