It's impolite, and demeaning. It's especially bad to lie about what I said. Only a coward would do that and then run away.
I won't lie to you. I might make a mistake, but I won't lie.
And I certainly won't ever lie about what you said.
If you want to disagree, OK, but please don't lie.
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
If you want to disagree, OK, but please don't lie.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
Re: If you want to disagree, OK, but please don't lie.
Who's lying. I have a choice, play come up with stupid responses to your spam or talk advanced technologies with David Brin. Which would you pick?
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: If you want to disagree, OK, but please don't lie.
Joe asked me to be patient.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: If you want to disagree, OK, but please don't lie.
That doesn't mean "let you be stupid without criticism."
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: If you want to disagree, OK, but please don't lie.
In fact I'd judge that to be no favor to you.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: If you want to disagree, OK, but please don't lie.
You're very wrong, and very sure of yourself. You have a bad case of Dunning-Kruger syndrome and need someone to knock you out of it.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: If you want to disagree, OK, but please don't lie.
What's your major, and why do you want it?
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: If you want to disagree, OK, but please don't lie.
Assuming of course you're not Unit 61398. I can't figure you any other way than those two.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
Re: If you want to disagree, OK, but please don't lie.
I've never lied once on this forum.
CO2 is a lagging indicator of warming. For human released CO2 to drive catastrophic warming requires it to to not have the characteristics of other CO2, which is that warmer has been better throughout human history, and that the gains associated with increasing CO2 are not statistically differentiable from other mechanisms forcing the climate.
I have yet to and will not lie on this forum.
But you have lied.
You said I was on your ignore list.
Your sadly shortened life is the more wasted because you propagate a fraud accepted by it's founders to bring about the impoverishment of billions, and early death of millions.
CO2 is a lagging indicator of warming. For human released CO2 to drive catastrophic warming requires it to to not have the characteristics of other CO2, which is that warmer has been better throughout human history, and that the gains associated with increasing CO2 are not statistically differentiable from other mechanisms forcing the climate.
I have yet to and will not lie on this forum.
But you have lied.
You said I was on your ignore list.
Your sadly shortened life is the more wasted because you propagate a fraud accepted by it's founders to bring about the impoverishment of billions, and early death of millions.
molon labe
montani semper liberi
para fides paternae patria
montani semper liberi
para fides paternae patria
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: If you want to disagree, OK, but please don't lie.
I'm sorry, I must directly contradict you.TDPerk wrote:I've never lied once on this forum.
You claimed I said something about "different CO2[sic]."
Either produce a quote or admit you lied. Period.
This is not a negotiation. This is a determination of whether you suffer from delusions or not.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
Re: If you want to disagree, OK, but please don't lie.
"Either produce a quote or admit you lied. Period."
I never claimed they said it, I said the theory of AGW requires it.
"And I certainly won't ever lie about what you said."
You just did lie about what I said! You were claiming I was misquoting someone, else why would you want a quote?
Please don't lie the next time you claim you've put me on your ignore list.
I know you're an attention whore misspending their sadly shortened but too long life, but you don't have to be a liar, too.
I never claimed they said it, I said the theory of AGW requires it.
"And I certainly won't ever lie about what you said."
You just did lie about what I said! You were claiming I was misquoting someone, else why would you want a quote?
Please don't lie the next time you claim you've put me on your ignore list.
I know you're an attention whore misspending their sadly shortened but too long life, but you don't have to be a liar, too.
molon labe
montani semper liberi
para fides paternae patria
montani semper liberi
para fides paternae patria
Re: If you want to disagree, OK, but please don't lie.
"This is a determination of whether you suffer from delusions or not."
You're not capable.
You're not capable.
molon labe
montani semper liberi
para fides paternae patria
montani semper liberi
para fides paternae patria
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: If you want to disagree, OK, but please don't lie.
You claimed I said it.
You claim it you prove it.
You fail you lied.
You claim it you prove it.
You fail you lied.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
Re: If you want to disagree, OK, but please don't lie.
"You claimed I said it."
Oh yeah?!
Your turn, quote it.
You liar.
Oh yeah?!
Your turn, quote it.
You liar.
molon labe
montani semper liberi
para fides paternae patria
montani semper liberi
para fides paternae patria
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: If you want to disagree, OK, but please don't lie.
Typical. Bye.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.