determine scientific truth.
According to you guys it's better than peer review.
Great, let's elect twelve Down's Syndrome sufferers and
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Great, let's elect twelve Down's Syndrome sufferers and
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: Great, let's elect twelve Down's Syndrome sufferers and
They'll actually prolly do better than you fools. They're not bright enough to deny stuff because someone tells them to.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: Great, let's elect twelve Down's Syndrome sufferers and
declare them President. They'll do better than Reagan, Bush, and Bush, and worse than Clinton and Obama.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.