Whatever Happened To Science

[Schneibster]

Nothing happened to science.

They just released the two-way wrist TV. Maybe you missed it.

Looks like peer review worked fine there.

[Jccarlton]

Watch out for the big gov spamming of real science.

[Schneibster]

It wasn't big gov it was Samsung.

[Jccarlton]

Spamming gums up the scientific process.

[Schneibster]

Not for two-way wrist TVs it doesn't.

Nor big-screen TVs.

Nor microwave ovens.

Why do you claim climate is special?

[Jccarlton]

The science establishment believes it's own spam.

[Schneibster]

Another 40 Baez points.

40 points for claiming that the "scientific establishment" is engaged in a "conspiracy" to prevent your work from gaining its well-deserved fame, or suchlike.

Number 34 again.

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html

[Jccarlton]

Spammers gum up the free flow of creativity.

[Schneibster]

Yes, by doing stupid things like denying peer review.

Oh, was that you denying peer review on the other thread?

Yep, sure was.

Well whadda ya know.

[Jccarlton]

Spam is the reason for science failures.

[Schneibster]

Lack of peer review is the reason for science failures:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamarckism

[Jccarlton]

Science spammers are not capable of understanding what they spam.

[Schneibster]

So you've never heard of Lamarckism?

Snicker.

[Jccarlton]

They won't let you make spam in any laboratory. It's too toxic and more dangerous than any radiation.

[Schneibster]

That's definitely a yes.

Better go look it up.

You might want to read up on Paul Kammerer and the midwife toad, too.