paperburn1 wrote:Keep in mind this is what others have claimed. Just search for yourself on google. Here is a starting point. http://talkrational.org/
It has little-to-nothing to do with his role in diagnosing server problems. It has everything to do with giving him the keys to reams of sensitive information.
Are you forgetting the part where he used my IP address (however he got it) to try and "scare me" in the most flailingly butthurt fashion? You know, where he brought up the F.B.I. (lollerskates) and made vague (equally hilarious) hints about how much he "knew" about me?
See?
I knew I couldn't trust you, Dickie boi.
Why don't you head on back home to talkirrational and stop contaminating the science board?
Is it because your hate is so strong, Dickie boi? Did I get to you that much?
Good.
Last edited by Schneibster on Thu Oct 31, 2013 9:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
It's also pretty transparent to start attacking the messenger when you can't deny the message any more.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
paperburn1 wrote:Keep in mind this is what others have claimed. Just search for yourself on google. Here is a starting point. http://talkrational.org/
It has little-to-nothing to do with his role in diagnosing server problems. It has everything to do with giving him the keys to reams of sensitive information.
Are you forgetting the part where he used my IP address (however he got it) to try and "scare me" in the most flailingly butthurt fashion? You know, where he brought up the F.B.I. (lollerskates) and made vague (equally hilarious) hints about how much he "knew" about me?
I am not going to waste time trying to find what you supposedly already found. Link to the 2 sites you found, please?
And i have no knowledge of the the IP scandal. In which thread did this happen?
Everything is bullshit unless proven otherwise. -A.C. Beddoe
paperburn1 wrote:Keep in mind this is what others have claimed. Just search for yourself on google. Here is a starting point. http://talkrational.org/
It has little-to-nothing to do with his role in diagnosing server problems. It has everything to do with giving him the keys to reams of sensitive information.
Are you forgetting the part where he used my IP address (however he got it) to try and "scare me" in the most flailingly butthurt fashion? You know, where he brought up the F.B.I. (lollerskates) and made vague (equally hilarious) hints about how much he "knew" about me?
I am not going to waste time trying to find what you supposedly already found. Link to the 2 sites you found, please?
And i have no knowledge of the the IP scandal. In which thread did this happen?
He's from another site and trying to dynamite this one. They do it for fun then brag about it on their home site.
It's called "lulz" or "lulzing." Their single intent is disruption. They're very like Alex' gang in Clockwork Orange.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
paperburn1 wrote:Keep in mind this is what others have claimed. Just search for yourself on google. Here is a starting point. http://talkrational.org/
It has little-to-nothing to do with his role in diagnosing server problems. It has everything to do with giving him the keys to reams of sensitive information.
Are you forgetting the part where he used my IP address (however he got it) to try and "scare me" in the most flailingly butthurt fashion? You know, where he brought up the F.B.I. (lollerskates) and made vague (equally hilarious) hints about how much he "knew" about me?
Wait, what? You gotta be sh*tting me?
Are you saying Scheisser did that?
Do you have any evidence you can present regarding this? (I believe you, but i'm thinking Joe might need to see it. )
‘What all the wise men promised has not happened, and what all the damned fools said would happen has come to pass.’
— Lord Melbourne —
paperburn1 wrote:Are you forgetting the part where he used my IP address (however he got it) to try and "scare me" in the most flailingly butthurt fashion? You know, where he brought up the F.B.I. (lollerskates) and made vague (equally hilarious) hints about how much he "knew" about me?
That's both a civil and a criminal violation. If true, you should forward copies of this to the FBI.
"Courage is not just a virtue, but the form of every virtue at the testing point." C. S. Lewis
The main one looks like this, and his first name is Richard. I have his IP address from his trying to hack my web site, apparently not realizing my servers are in my house and I'm an expert system admin, web site admin, web programmer, web server programmer, and database programmer as well has having experience with virtual machines. I found out far more about him than he did about me, and it scares living hell out of him. He thinks I got it from talkrational, which is where these trolls hang out. In fact, I got it because he's a fool and tried to hack my site. I have tentacles up his hoozoo that are coming out his nose. I drop a hint every so often to keep him burbling. I like playing head games with people who think they can hack my site.
This person pretends to be a person with aeronautical experience he does not possess on this site, with the username "paperburn1." I doubt he's competent to hack your site; he couldn't hack mine. Still, keep your eyes open.
Attachments
Prickie.jpg (1.66 KiB) Viewed 2693 times
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
Sorry I got your handle wrong in the apology GIThruster, if we all just ignore our problem eventually it will go too far and hopefully appropriate action will then be taken.
And honestly, it seems probable to me the only reason our troll has his own web site is so he can taunt people to go there and get their IP addresses so he can stalk and threaten them. No big wizardry there. If he contacted you paperburn1, and made even veiled threats, you really should contact the FBI and let them contact the troll. Do not take matters into your own hands.
"Courage is not just a virtue, but the form of every virtue at the testing point." C. S. Lewis
Schneib has not contacted me and does not have my IP, please reread my post. This is what other people have claimed he has done. Several such claim exist on sites. It is highly possible Schnied’s story may be true. After all he is not the most pleasing person to deal with . Already he has jumped to the conclusion I am his arch nemesis from another site.
What worries me is more than one person makes that claim and he has ask for access to admin. But searching for the phrases that I posted previously you can find the exact information I was referencing.
search for the below text on the web site I stated before.
It has little-to-nothing to do with his role in diagnosing server problems. It has everything to do with giving him the keys to reams of sensitive information.
Are you forgetting the part where he used my IP address (however he got it) to try and "scare me" in the most flailingly butthurt fashion? You know, where he brought up the F.B.I. (lollerskates) and made vague (equally hilarious) hints about how much he "knew" about me?
I am not a nuclear physicist, but play one on the internet.
paperburn1 wrote:Schneib has not contacted me and does not have my IP, please reread my post. This is what other people have claimed he has done. Several such claim exist on sites. It is highly possible Schnied’s story may be true. After all he is not the most pleasing person to deal with . Already he has jumped to the conclusion I am his arch nemesis from another site.
What worries me is more than one person makes that claim and he has ask for access to admin. But searching for the phrases that I posted previously you can find the exact information I was referencing.
search for the below text on the web site I stated before.
It has little-to-nothing to do with his role in diagnosing server problems. It has everything to do with giving him the keys to reams of sensitive information.
Are you forgetting the part where he used my IP address (however he got it) to try and "scare me" in the most flailingly butthurt fashion? You know, where he brought up the F.B.I. (lollerskates) and made vague (equally hilarious) hints about how much he "knew" about me?
Here's the thread: http://talkrational.org/showthread.php?t=21517
The IP address thing is right at the first page.
The commenter has mentioned BA(bad astronomy) and Randi. BA has a new site, so I don't what you find there. I haven't registered with any of them, so I don't want to spend time looking at his bad behavior. Frankly, what's here is bad enough.
So now we find out I got my own personal little nutjob stalker following me around "dispensing justice" or whatever his twisted little mind is telling him.
Isn't that cute.
And there are people here who are big enough fools they just went right along with him.
Idiots.
You should feel dirty and used.
Personally, I think it's funny. You're such fools, such sheep, so easily maneuvered.
Meanwhile, Dickie boi can't get kicked off here. All he can do is have more
Rage little boi.
Oh, and so you know he's gonna go write stories about how stupid you all are over on talkrational. And they're gonna all gonna laugh at you. It's all for the lulz as far as they're concerned.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
choff wrote:If blackmail is a threat and you're afraid to got to the FBI, quietly contact T-P site admin instead.
And you know who he is.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
