and your only intent is to disrupt that which you cannot deny.
This is called "cognitive dissonance." It means you've met the truth, you don't like it, and you're trying to deny it.
Spamming Means You're Out Of Arguments
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Spamming Means You're Out Of Arguments
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
Re: Spamming Means You're Out Of Arguments
No, it means you are a stupid f*ck on whom I will not WASTE any argument.
You are a f*cking loser troll. Nobody gives a shit about your arguments. You don't have any.
This is the only reasonable response to you and your ilk.
You are a f*cking loser troll. Nobody gives a shit about your arguments. You don't have any.
This is the only reasonable response to you and your ilk.
‘What all the wise men promised has not happened, and what all the damned fools said would happen has come to pass.’
— Lord Melbourne —
— Lord Melbourne —
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: Spamming Means You're Out Of Arguments
You have no argument but spamming.
You're frustrated, and you know you're wrong, and the only alternative to admitting it is to act out. To misbehave. To spam.
You're frustrated, and you know you're wrong, and the only alternative to admitting it is to act out. To misbehave. To spam.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
Re: Spamming Means You're Out Of Arguments
We are all laughing at you.
‘What all the wise men promised has not happened, and what all the damned fools said would happen has come to pass.’
— Lord Melbourne —
— Lord Melbourne —
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: Spamming Means You're Out Of Arguments
There is no "we."
You are spamming at me.
You are spamming at me.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
Re: Spamming Means You're Out Of Arguments
And once again the HYPOCRISY of your thread title simply escapes you because you are a complete fool.
‘What all the wise men promised has not happened, and what all the damned fools said would happen has come to pass.’
— Lord Melbourne —
— Lord Melbourne —
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: Spamming Means You're Out Of Arguments
Spam is repetition.
I'm not repeating; I'm responding with a new and separate argument to each argument that's presented, that I care to respond to.
That's not spamming.
You are spamming.
I'm not repeating; I'm responding with a new and separate argument to each argument that's presented, that I care to respond to.
That's not spamming.
You are spamming.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
Re: Spamming Means You're Out Of Arguments
‘What all the wise men promised has not happened, and what all the damned fools said would happen has come to pass.’
— Lord Melbourne —
— Lord Melbourne —
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: Spamming Means You're Out Of Arguments
I mean, really, you keep pretending if you repeat the same stupid thing it will make the smarts go away.Diogenes wrote:
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
Re: Spamming Means You're Out Of Arguments
‘What all the wise men promised has not happened, and what all the damned fools said would happen has come to pass.’
— Lord Melbourne —
— Lord Melbourne —
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: Spamming Means You're Out Of Arguments
You're a petulant child.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
Re: Spamming Means You're Out Of Arguments
‘What all the wise men promised has not happened, and what all the damned fools said would happen has come to pass.’
— Lord Melbourne —
— Lord Melbourne —
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: Spamming Means You're Out Of Arguments
And so here we are again.
You'll find the Colonel won't even do for me; I'm smarter than he is, Unit 61398.
You'll find the Colonel won't even do for me; I'm smarter than he is, Unit 61398.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: Spamming Means You're Out Of Arguments
You have spent two more days pursuing this strategy, Unit 61398. It's not working.
I intend to use your tactics and strategies against you. What I recommend is that you stop lying or start leaving.
I intend to use your tactics and strategies against you. What I recommend is that you stop lying or start leaving.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.