Watts tells lies on TV for money. That's what actors do. Nothing wrong with that until people start pretending they mean something more than just lies told on TV for money.
He doesn't even have a degree in meteorology. He's a television actor perpetrating a hoax.
He wouldn't know a Navier-Stokes equation if it jumped up and bit him on the hind end.
I thought we were discussing science, not science fiction.
http://www.desmogblog.com/anthony-watts
Anthony Watts is an actor, not a geophysicist
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Anthony Watts is an actor, not a geophysicist
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: Anthony Watts is an actor, not a geophysicist
Still waiting for a response on this.
Why is an actor more persuasive than real science?
Why is an actor more persuasive than real science?
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
Re: Anthony Watts is an actor, not a geophysicist
Why is a boob model more persuasive than all the medical doctors in the world? "Its on FOX news, its gotta be true".Schneibster wrote:Still waiting for a response on this.
Why is an actor more persuasive than real science?
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: Anthony Watts is an actor, not a geophysicist
I'm sorry, your question appears to be gauged to distract attention from the subject.Skipjack wrote:Why is a boob model more persuasive than all the medical doctors in the world? "Its on FOX news, its gotta be true".Schneibster wrote:Still waiting for a response on this.
Why is an actor more persuasive than real science?
I didn't mention or show any "boob models." Nor did I link anything from Faux Entertainment.
Do you often make up stories about what other people say?
Just askin'.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: Anthony Watts is an actor, not a geophysicist
And I note there still has not been a direct assertion or any proof that Anthony Watts has any climate geophysics credentials other than "actor" ever anywhere.
Do feel free to post credible evidence to the contrary at any time.
Do feel free to post credible evidence to the contrary at any time.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: Anthony Watts is an actor, not a geophysicist
Unfortunately, Watts is still an actor, not a geophysicist.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
Re: Anthony Watts is an actor, not a geophysicist
I was trying to draw parallels to the fact that people would rather believe Jenny McCarthy and her bogus anti vaccination movement than the majority of medical doctors in the world. I guess I was being too subtle.Schneibster wrote:I'm sorry, your question appears to be gauged to distract attention from the subject.Skipjack wrote:Why is a boob model more persuasive than all the medical doctors in the world? "Its on FOX news, its gotta be true".Schneibster wrote:Still waiting for a response on this.
Why is an actor more persuasive than real science?
I didn't mention or show any "boob models." Nor did I link anything from Faux Entertainment.
Do you often make up stories about what other people say?
Just askin'.
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: Anthony Watts is an actor, not a geophysicist
Unfortunately I'm not an anti-vaxxer.Skipjack wrote:I was trying to draw parallels to the fact that people would rather believe Jenny McCarthy and her bogus anti vaccination movement than the majority of medical doctors in the world. I guess I was being too subtle.Schneibster wrote:I'm sorry, your question appears to be gauged to distract attention from the subject.Skipjack wrote:Why is a boob model more persuasive than all the medical doctors in the world? "Its on FOX news, its gotta be true".
I didn't mention or show any "boob models." Nor did I link anything from Faux Entertainment.
Do you often make up stories about what other people say?
Just askin'.
So I still have to keep asking if you often make up stories about what other people say?
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.