Watts SO MUCH FUN!!!!

Discuss life, the universe, and everything with other members of this site. Get to know your fellow polywell enthusiasts.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

Post Reply
Jccarlton
Posts: 1747
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 6:14 pm
Location: Southern Ct

Watts SO MUCH FUN!!!!

Post by Jccarlton »

Just when you think that Watts is just another of those horrible denier sites, he takes things to the next level:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/10/15/o ... more-95653
The Koch Bros, supporting Nova, who knew. There must be something wrong with that program.

Schneibster
Posts: 1805
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
Location: Monterey, CA, USA

Re: Watts SO MUCH FUN!!!!

Post by Schneibster »

How come you keep bringing up this television guy and avoiding the scientists?

It looks like you don't really want to talk about the science.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.

MSimon
Posts: 14335
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Rockford, Illinois
Contact:

Re: Watts SO MUCH FUN!!!!

Post by MSimon »

Schneibster wrote:How come you keep bringing up this television guy and avoiding the scientists?

It looks like you don't really want to talk about the science.
But Mann - the subject of the post - IS a scientist. Hockey stick splice and all that. He has proved that if you can find the right tree you can do superior science. Providing you exclude the wrong trees.
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.

Schneibster
Posts: 1805
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
Location: Monterey, CA, USA

Re: Watts SO MUCH FUN!!!!

Post by Schneibster »

MSimon wrote:
Schneibster wrote:How come you keep bringing up this television guy and avoiding the scientists?

It looks like you don't really want to talk about the science.
But Mann - the subject of the post - IS a scientist. Hockey stick splice and all that. He has proved that if you can find the right tree you can do superior science. Providing you exclude the wrong trees.
But Mann was investigated by five different authorities and they all found that he'd acted with the highest honesty. One of them was a court case that got thrown out with prejudice.

You're lying again.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.

Jccarlton
Posts: 1747
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 6:14 pm
Location: Southern Ct

Re: Watts SO MUCH FUN!!!!

Post by Jccarlton »

MSimon wrote:
Schneibster wrote:How come you keep bringing up this television guy and avoiding the scientists?

It looks like you don't really want to talk about the science.
But Mann - the subject of the post - IS a scientist. Hockey stick splice and all that. He has proved that if you can find the right tree you can do superior science. Providing you exclude the wrong trees.
He's been watching the game, but doesn't know who the teams are, the players, the score, or even the rules. Yet he's an expert. Also he doesn't want to have to look at anything he considers evil, which is anything coming from what he calls a "crank."

Schneibster
Posts: 1805
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
Location: Monterey, CA, USA

Re: Watts SO MUCH FUN!!!!

Post by Schneibster »

Jccarlton wrote:
MSimon wrote:
Schneibster wrote:How come you keep bringing up this television guy and avoiding the scientists?

It looks like you don't really want to talk about the science.
But Mann - the subject of the post - IS a scientist. Hockey stick splice and all that. He has proved that if you can find the right tree you can do superior science. Providing you exclude the wrong trees.
He's been watching the game, but doesn't know who the teams are, the players, the score, or even the rules. Yet he's an expert. Also he doesn't want to have to look at anything he considers evil, which is anything coming from what he calls a "crank."
After he gets investigated five times and they all say he's good you're slandering him. Sorry but that's what cranks do.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.

Schneibster
Posts: 1805
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
Location: Monterey, CA, USA

Re: Watts SO MUCH FUN!!!!

Post by Schneibster »

Mann is actually the plaintiff in two defamation suits and a witness in several more, and I'll be updating this thread, or at least this forum, with their ongoing progress.

:D
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.

Stubby
Posts: 877
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2012 4:05 pm

Re: Watts SO MUCH FUN!!!!

Post by Stubby »

Jccarlton wrote:Just when you think that Watts is just another of those horrible denier sites, he takes things to the next level:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/10/15/o ... more-95653
The Koch Bros, supporting Nova, who knew. There must be something wrong with that program.
As long as the content is not critical of the Kochs, why would they not fund a program?

BUT...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/0 ... 27038.html
Everything is bullshit unless proven otherwise. -A.C. Beddoe

Schneibster
Posts: 1805
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
Location: Monterey, CA, USA

Re: Watts SO MUCH FUN!!!!

Post by Schneibster »

Stubby wrote:
Jccarlton wrote:Just when you think that Watts is just another of those horrible denier sites, he takes things to the next level:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/10/15/o ... more-95653
The Koch Bros, supporting Nova, who knew. There must be something wrong with that program.
As long as the content is not critical of the Kochs, why would they not fund a program?

BUT...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/0 ... 27038.html
It's an ill wind indeed that blows no good. Maybe they feel guilty.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.

Post Reply