Climate

Discuss life, the universe, and everything with other members of this site. Get to know your fellow polywell enthusiasts.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

Schneibster
Posts: 1805
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
Location: Monterey, CA, USA

Re: Climate

Post by Schneibster »

GIThruster wrote:Yes, it is a bit hypocritical for Gore to live in a McMansion, especially when the meme spread about housing is that we all ought to be satisfied with less. Much worse is his traveling very often in a private jet rather than taking mass air transport. However, I would not call Gore an idiot. He truly believes what he says.
He's OK. He's a bit of a wuss though. OTOH he does know more tech personally than most politicians; blows it on things like the polar bears occasionally, but if that's the only one he blew, from a scientific POV, it's far far better than any other politician. He also doesn't have Bush 43's daddy's buddies to do all his mansion upgrades for free.
GIThruster wrote:It's just that like most beliefs adopted apart from reason, where one believes either what one wants to be true or is afraid is true (hence the division of delusions: grandiose and paranoid), he adopted the belief in AGW and acted on it with no concern for the repercussions if the thing he is afraid of were NOT true.
You mean apart from the 14000 to 25. (When he said it, it was 9000 to 12, to be perfectly accurate.)
GIThruster wrote:The repercussions are enormous and just saying, the pressure to respond to the AGW thesis predates all the data by decades--since before when our new troll was born.
You have no idea when I was born.

Furthermore, that "pressure" was started by Darwin a couple centuries ago. It's the triumph of science over superstition. You should get used to it. You aren't going to lose; you already lost, before WWI. Boy that snake sure twists a long time after its head gets cut off.
GIThruster wrote:Despite all that I will say Gore's book is worth reading and I thought the fact he jumped on X-33 was terrific. I wish we had more VP's who gave a darn about NASA.
So why are you denying global warming? It doesn't make any sense.
Last edited by Schneibster on Fri Oct 11, 2013 6:35 pm, edited 2 times in total.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.

GIThruster
Posts: 4686
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:17 pm

Re: Climate

Post by GIThruster »

Schneibster wrote:So why are you denying global warming? It doesn't make any sense.
As I have explained many times (you were too busy being an abusive asshole to listen) I think the evidence is inconclusive. There has been a huge amount of fraud on the AGW side of the argument and excellent scientists very often poke fun at how ridiculous the pro-AGW arguments are.

I used to teach this stuff as a TA at Portland State in Environmental Ethics, and I'm telling you, you do not know what you pretend to know. Most of what you believe is wrong. For instance, the planet is currently in a cooling phase because our sun is in a cooling phase. We don't know what the climate will be like when the sun goes hotter again in a few years, and because the science is so poor--actually qualifies as pathological in many instances--we are not finding out whether our way of life is in danger.

Regardless though, it is entirely true that if the planet heats significantly, there are plenty of ways for humanity to survive. There is after all, an entire untaped continent under ice right now. That's prime real estate that hasn't been used in 30 million years.
"Courage is not just a virtue, but the form of every virtue at the testing point." C. S. Lewis

paperburn1
Posts: 2488
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 5:53 am
Location: Third rock from the sun.

Re: Climate

Post by paperburn1 »

Schneibster wrote:
paperburn1 wrote:This AL Gore thing, he is a typical GW idiot.
Al Gore is not a climate geophysicist.

You're lying again.
Never said he was, just the facts S just the facts
BTW GW MC-mansion is only 4000 SQ ft
I am not a nuclear physicist, but play one on the internet.

Schneibster
Posts: 1805
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
Location: Monterey, CA, USA

Re: Climate

Post by Schneibster »

GIThruster wrote:
Schneibster wrote:So why are you denying global warming? It doesn't make any sense.
As I have explained many times (you were too busy being an abusive asshole to listen) I think the evidence is inconclusive.
I have a hint for you: I mirror. And if you think I've been an abusive asshole here, you haven't look what else I've done elsewhere. You guys, on an absolute scale, are pretty mild, so I kind of tone it down for you. Try to keep it to your level.
GIThruster wrote:There has been a huge amount of fraud on the AGW side
This accusation, especially in the absence of any reliable evidence whatsoever, immediately tells me I am dealing with someone unreasonable.

I'll do you the kindness this time of assuming you don't know it and are just repeating lies you've heard because you don't know any better.
GIThruster wrote:of the argument and excellent scientists very often poke fun at how ridiculous the pro-AGW arguments are.
14000 to 25.
GIThruster wrote:I used to teach this stuff as a TA at Portland State in Environmental Ethics, and I'm telling you, you do not know what you pretend to know.
I don't pretend to know anything, and it's precisely this kind of comment that started me mirroring you. I know exactly what I'm talking about. I can explain why CO2 is a global warming gas, what its spectrum is, what types of vibration of the molecule absorb and emit what exact wavelength of photon, what the likelihood of that photon being emitted in any given direction is, where the heat comes from, where the heat goes, and where the CO2 comes from and where it goes. Sorry, I think I know EVERYTHING about it. And you don't appear to be prepared to discuss any of it. Have you ever even reviewed either any GISS GCM, or the HADCRUT models? Personally I don't think you know anything about either the physics or the geophysics of the problem, nor anything at all about models.
GIThruster wrote:Most of what you believe is wrong.
You have no idea what I believe. You have only seen me talk about what I KNOW. What I can PROVE. You on the other hand make irresponsible, careless, unprovable statements about other peoples' minds who you have not ever even listened to for a second, because they don't believe what you like, and then pretend they're "abusing" you. If you can't take it don't dish it out, is my advice. I can take it fine; but if I dish it out, I'm not a hypocrite. I never said I wasn't dishing it out. You are; you did.
GIThruster wrote:For instance, the planet is currently in a cooling phase because our sun is in a cooling phase.
It has nothing to do with the Sun, and the Sun is not in a cooling phase; solar minimum was years ago. Solar Maximum is coming up in 2016 or so.

The "cooling phase" you're talking about will lead to the next glaciation in about thirty thousand years. And it's caused by the Milankovic cycles, not the solar cycle.
GIThruster wrote:We don't know what the climate will be like when the sun goes hotter again in a few years,
You're insane. We won't know what the weather will be like; but we know the climate will continue to get hotter. 95% probability, according to the IPCC AR5.
GIThruster wrote:and because the science is so poor--
The science is not poor. 14000 to 25.
GIThruster wrote:actually qualifies as pathological in many instances--we are not finding out whether our way of life is in danger.
Nobody's interested in your way of life. We're trying to stay alive. You're a nutjob, counting your money while your house burns down around you.
GIThruster wrote:Regardless though, it is entirely true that if the planet heats significantly, there are plenty of ways for humanity to survive.
Sure; remove CO2 from the atmosphere by growing extra stocks of diesel and gasoline. Provided the oil sociopaths don't squish the technology to maximize their profits.
GIThruster wrote:There is after all, an entire untaped continent under ice right now. That's prime real estate that hasn't been used in 30 million years.
And if the ice comes off it, it will take more real estate, currently occupied by 60% of the human race, than it reveals. Not to mention, I assume you think you can move New York, London, LA, and Singapore. I'm gonna guess the residents of said cities are less than sanguine regarding your claims, in that case. I would be.
Last edited by Schneibster on Fri Oct 11, 2013 7:08 pm, edited 3 times in total.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.

Schneibster
Posts: 1805
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
Location: Monterey, CA, USA

Re: Climate

Post by Schneibster »

paperburn1 wrote:
Schneibster wrote:
paperburn1 wrote:This AL Gore thing, he is a typical GW idiot.
Al Gore is not a climate geophysicist.

You're lying again.
Never said he was, just the facts S just the facts
How about just the relevant facts? Gore is not relevant.

I thought we were discussing science, not Gore. If you want to discuss Gore start another thread. I'll watch.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.

GIThruster
Posts: 4686
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:17 pm

Re: Climate

Post by GIThruster »

Schneibster wrote:I have a hint for you: I mirror. And if you think I've been an abusive asshole here, you haven't look what else I've done elsewhere. You guys, on an absolute scale, are pretty mild, so I kind of tone it down for you. Try to keep it to your level.
I have a hint for you: you're an emotionally disturbed weasel, who would be bitch-slapped into the next century were you ever to speak to me in that tone in person. You are habitually abusive and childish, and obviously severely emotionally retarded. Instead of going from one location on the web to the next looking for people to argue with (and i promise you, no one here is impressed with you) you should be seeing a shrink to work on your emotional issues.

In short, you need help and there are no psychologists here. Please go away.

And with that I return the sod to IGNORE.
"Courage is not just a virtue, but the form of every virtue at the testing point." C. S. Lewis

Schneibster
Posts: 1805
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
Location: Monterey, CA, USA

Re: Climate

Post by Schneibster »

GIThruster wrote:
Schneibster wrote:I have a hint for you: I mirror. And if you think I've been an abusive asshole here, you haven't look what else I've done elsewhere. You guys, on an absolute scale, are pretty mild, so I kind of tone it down for you. Try to keep it to your level.
I have a hint for you: you're an emotionally disturbed weasel, who would be bitch-slapped into the next century were you ever to speak to me in that tone in person.
Children make threats when they get pwnt on the Internet.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.

Schneibster
Posts: 1805
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
Location: Monterey, CA, USA

Re: Climate

Post by Schneibster »

GIThruster wrote:
Schneibster wrote:I have a hint for you: I mirror. And if you think I've been an abusive asshole here, you haven't look what else I've done elsewhere. You guys, on an absolute scale, are pretty mild, so I kind of tone it down for you. Try to keep it to your level.
I have a hint for you: you're an emotionally disturbed weasel, who would be bitch-slapped into the next century were you ever to speak to me in that tone in person. You are habitually abusive and childish, and obviously severely emotionally retarded. Instead of going from one location on the web to the next looking for people to argue with (and i promise you, no one here is impressed with you) you should be seeing a shrink to work on your emotional issues.

In short, you need help and there are no psychologists here. Please go away.

And with that I return the sod to IGNORE.
Oh, and reported. And forwarded. I expect I won't hear any more about insulting people. Considering. I can copy MSimon if you like.

And in fact, @MSimon, I thought you guys were all honest and stuff, and didn't lie, and didn't insult people. And stuff.

So did you lie to me? I'm waiting, and your honor hangs in the balance.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.

Schneibster
Posts: 1805
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
Location: Monterey, CA, USA

Re: Climate

Post by Schneibster »

I think really that your use of psychological terminology as abuse is extremely revealing.

Just sayin'.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.

choff
Posts: 2447
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 5:02 am
Location: Vancouver, Canada

Re: Climate

Post by choff »

Al Gore's linked to Teapot Dome.
CHoff

Schneibster
Posts: 1805
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
Location: Monterey, CA, USA

Re: Climate

Post by Schneibster »

choff wrote:Al Gore's linked to Teapot Dome.
Errr, a) he's not that old, and b) so what, it was ninety years ago?
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.

Schneibster
Posts: 1805
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
Location: Monterey, CA, USA

Re: Climate

Post by Schneibster »

So I really gotta know, GICluster, what got you so excited you started making threats and acting out? I just don't see it. Is being proven wrong that scary to you?

I also gotta ask, do you think the fact you think you could punch me in the nose makes you right?
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.

Schneibster
Posts: 1805
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
Location: Monterey, CA, USA

Re: Climate

Post by Schneibster »

And now there are six ways: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 ... 205331.htm

This one turns literal sewage into hydrogen gas.

Oh, and it cleans the sewage better too.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.

Diogenes
Posts: 6976
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 3:33 pm

Re: Climate

Post by Diogenes »

GIThruster wrote: I have a hint for you: you're an emotionally disturbed weasel, who would be bitch-slapped into the next century were you ever to speak to me in that tone in person. You are habitually abusive and childish, and obviously severely emotionally retarded. Instead of going from one location on the web to the next looking for people to argue with (and i promise you, no one here is impressed with you) you should be seeing a shrink to work on your emotional issues.

In short, you need help and there are no psychologists here. Please go away.

And with that I return the sod to IGNORE.

I am befuddled as to why you thought it was worthwhile to take him off ignore.


At least now we know the answer as to what sort of person would have made a good camp guard at Auschwitz.
‘What all the wise men promised has not happened, and what all the damned fools said would happen has come to pass.’
— Lord Melbourne —

Schneibster
Posts: 1805
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
Location: Monterey, CA, USA

Re: Climate

Post by Schneibster »

Diogenes wrote:At least now we know the answer as to what sort of person would have made a good camp guard at Auschwitz.
Reported, and forwarded to @MSimon for his attention.

What is the point of this, other than harassment?
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.

Locked