paperburn1 wrote:I think bigot is the perfect definition of some people on this general forum.
We have our own Archie Bunker of the left here in general.
But as long as he (and others) keeps it in general , let him spew all he wants.
All I hear is the rain.
So now it's bigoted to insist reality is real?
Gee, and here we all thought it was just being sane.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
paperburn1 wrote:It is bigoted to insist your reality is real.
Then you claim no one is insane.
Ridiculous.
Meanwhile, it's not "my" reality. It's reality. Look in a telescope. Read a cosmology book. Learn about evolutionary molecular biology. You or your close associates claim they're all wrong, one way or another. I can't imagine someone who can look in a telescope and not understand that the world is not a thousand miles across with a ceiling jebus lives above.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
Sorry I prefer 21st century economics and science. Lose the science denial and we might talk. Right now your only defense is this "your reality" crap. We put people in coats with no cuffs and medicate them when they hallucinate magic voices from imaginary friends telling them what to do. That's what your reality is, unless you agree to consensus reality.
As far as philosophy, when the philosophers admit they got burned in the Sokal affair and they've lost their way, and find their way back to reality from Derridist phantasies (deconstruct deconstructionism), I'll start listening again. Until then they're in the doghouse for being posers. I absolutely despise post-modernism; a more ridiculous swamp of imprecise and deluded thinking cannot occur in any other discipline because none of their practitioners are so gullible. Talk about opening your mind so far your brain falls out... eradicate pose-modernism.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
do you deny "diogenes" has extreme, violent views antithetical towards homosexuals or do you agree with said views?
And here the stubby little pr*ck is projecting. I have never advocated violence towards Homosexuals.
It's probably one of his fetish fantasies or something. National Socialists (Like Stubby) were all about the Violence, doncha know.
Once again, stubby needs to be within arms reach of someone who can correct his nasty little accusations.
‘What all the wise men promised has not happened, and what all the damned fools said would happen has come to pass.’
— Lord Melbourne —
Stubby wrote:Oh so sorry
I meant the "kill all the homosexuals" charity auction
I Don't go to any of your NAZI (NAtional soZIalism) fundraisers either.
Oops my bad. Maybe it was the 'homosexuals are deviant, vile , dirty, disgusting child molesting perverts aka homophobes r us' convention free dictionary give away
Everything is bullshit unless proven otherwise. -A.C. Beddoe
Stubby, if you're going to continue to pursue the character assassination, I think you ought to take the advise someone just gave the most recent troll, and show some evidence. Lately you appear to be arguing for the sake of arguing, with no real point to be made.
There's no doubt D can be pretty abrasive (like the rest of us) but I don't recall him ever doing anything approaching gay bashing. Accusations to that end sans evidence just make you seem petty and bitter.
"Courage is not just a virtue, but the form of every virtue at the testing point." C. S. Lewis
GIThruster wrote:Stubby, if you're going to continue to pursue the character assassination, I think you ought to take the advise someone just gave the most recent troll, and show some evidence. Lately you appear to be arguing for the sake of arguing, with no real point to be made.
There's no doubt D can be pretty abrasive (like the rest of us) but I don't recall him ever doing anything approaching gay bashing. Accusations to that end sans evidence just make you seem petty and bitter.
So Diogenes is pro gay marriage?
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
Paul Ryan wrote:'Look, we know you don't like our position, we know you probably don't respect our position, but we're the Republican majority.' "
"You're stuck with us for a while, at least through the next election season, so we need to learn to have a conversation with each other,"
"This President won't agree to everything we need to do"
"A budget agreement with this President and this Senate won't solve our problems. But I hope it's a start." http://www.cnn.com/2013/10/11/politics/ ... ?hpt=hp_t1
- Recognize that not everyone shares your beliefs.
- Acknowledge there is a difference between what you consider ideal and what can be achieved.
- Bargain for what you want by conceding on points of lesser importance to you. (rather than by threatening to throw a tantrum and shut everything down until you get your way)
