Are the Uniforms getting Darker?

[Diogenes]

Living in Richmond, I never have to say I'm Surrey.

http://bc.ctvnews.ca/surrey-man-woman-c ... -1.1349944

Oh, that's bad!

[choff]

Hopefully, no copycats tomorrow.

[hanelyp]

http://www.courthousenews.com/2013/07/03/59061.htm

LAS VEGAS (CN) - Henderson police arrested a family for refusing to let officers use their homes as lookouts for a domestic violence investigation of their neighbors, the family claims in court.

Anthony Mitchell and his parents Michael and Linda Mitchell sued the City of Henderson, its Police Chief Jutta Chambers, Officers Garret Poiner, Ronald Feola, Ramona Walls, Angela Walker, and Christopher Worley, and City of North Las Vegas and its Police Chief Joseph Chronister, in Federal Court.

3rd amendment, anyone?

No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

I'd say government agent => soldier for purposes of the 3rd.

[MSimon]

http://www.courthousenews.com/2013/07/03/59061.htm

LAS VEGAS (CN) - Henderson police arrested a family for refusing to let officers use their homes as lookouts for a domestic violence investigation of their neighbors, the family claims in court.

Anthony Mitchell and his parents Michael and Linda Mitchell sued the City of Henderson, its Police Chief Jutta Chambers, Officers Garret Poiner, Ronald Feola, Ramona Walls, Angela Walker, and Christopher Worley, and City of North Las Vegas and its Police Chief Joseph Chronister, in Federal Court.

3rd amendment, anyone?

No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

I'd say government agent => soldier for purposes of the 3rd.

What Constitution?

[Stubby]

http://www.courthousenews.com/2013/07/03/59061.htm

LAS VEGAS (CN) - Henderson police arrested a family for refusing to let officers use their homes as lookouts for a domestic violence investigation of their neighbors, the family claims in court.

Anthony Mitchell and his parents Michael and Linda Mitchell sued the City of Henderson, its Police Chief Jutta Chambers, Officers Garret Poiner, Ronald Feola, Ramona Walls, Angela Walker, and Christopher Worley, and City of North Las Vegas and its Police Chief Joseph Chronister, in Federal Court.

3rd amendment, anyone?

No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

I'd say government agent => soldier for purposes of the 3rd.

Hope they win big.

[Skipjack]

‘Hell to pay:’ Residents angry as RCMP seize guns from High River homes

‘It’s just like Nazi Germany,’ says resident

Of course this is nonsense. Gun laws were actually much more liberal under Hitler than they were under the conservative regime before him. if you were a "trustworthy German" that is...
Just saying, not everything bad is automatically something that Hitler did, not everything good is automatically something that Hitler did not do. It is a very weak form of argumentation.

[krenshala]

http://www.courthousenews.com/2013/07/03/59061.htm

LAS VEGAS (CN) - Henderson police arrested a family for refusing to let officers use their homes as lookouts for a domestic violence investigation of their neighbors, the family claims in court.

Anthony Mitchell and his parents Michael and Linda Mitchell sued the City of Henderson, its Police Chief Jutta Chambers, Officers Garret Poiner, Ronald Feola, Ramona Walls, Angela Walker, and Christopher Worley, and City of North Las Vegas and its Police Chief Joseph Chronister, in Federal Court.

3rd amendment, anyone?

No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

I'd say government agent => soldier for purposes of the 3rd.

Hope they win big.

They apparently have lots of opportunity to. This is one hell of a list.

The Mitchells seek punitive damages for violations of the third, fourth and 14th Amendments, assault and battery, conspiracy, defamation, abuse of process, malicious prosecution, negligence and emotional distress.

[TDPerk]

Gun laws were actually much more liberal under Hitler than they were under the conservative regime before him.

Of course that statement is nonsense, as you yourself then observe.

if you were a "trustworthy German" that is...

Just saying

Nothing at all. You said nothing of worth or note at all.

not everything bad is automatically something that Hitler did, not everything good is automatically something that Hitler did not do. It is a very weak form of argumentation.

It would be a weak form of argumentation if anyone had done that. Instead, it is noted--and you've agreed--those who most needed their human rights to an effective defense of self, others, and property saw those rights abrogated in a quite horrendous fashion.

The confiscation of firearms in bulk from a populace which is inoffensive with respect to just law and order is never appropriate, it is never just or a good idea, and it is Hitlerian in an evil way.

While I can see persons who are culturally German might devoutly hope for a day soon to be, that a person seen as also culturally German such as Hitler, will be forgotten by history--and such an unpleasant association then go by the wayside--I think it will be long indeed before the name Adolf Hitler stops being a watchword for apotheoetic evil. It will be as long before Hitler stops being Germanic in popular culture.

But you Austrians have hope of such coming sooner for you, a certain occupant of the Oval Office was recently publicly unaware that Austrians spoke German.

You've got that going for you.

[Skipjack]

Nothing at all. You said nothing of worth or note at all.

Yes I did. Overall, guns were a lot easier to aquire and own for the majority of the population under Hitler than they were under the previous, conservative regime.
That is a fact.

[MSimon]

Nothing at all. You said nothing of worth or note at all.

Yes I did. Overall, guns were a lot easier to aquire and own for the majority of the population under Hitler than they were under the previous, conservative regime.
That is a fact.

Only the political opposition was disarmed. Good idea?

[paperburn1]

Nothing at all. You said nothing of worth or note at all.

Yes I did. Overall, guns were a lot easier to aquire and own for the majority of the population under Hitler than they were under the previous, conservative regime.
That is a fact.

Only the political opposition was disarmed. Good idea?

One of the few times I wholeheartedly agree with Simon
I would say that's not true, only the politically favored and state supported "clubs" were allowed firearms
In 1928, a conservative majority to enact the Law on Firearms and Ammunition. This law relaxed gun restrictions and put into effect a strict firearm licensing scheme. This law explicitly revoked the 1919 Regulations on Weapons Ownership, which had banned all firearms possession.
Within a decade, Germany had gone from a brutal firearms seizure policy which, in times of unrest, entailed selective yet immediate execution for mere possession of a firearm, to a modern, comprehensive gun control law.
In 1935, Jewish residents were no longer considered citizens, and thus gave the precedent for new laws to prevent any resistance. The gun control provisions under the 1938 German Weapons Act, which superseded the 1928 law. As under the 1928 law, ONLY citizens were required to have a permit to carry a firearm and a separate permit to acquire a firearm. Furthermore, the law restricted ownership of firearms to "...persons whose trustworthiness is not in question and who can show a need for a (gun) permit."
The 1938 revisions introduced restrictions specifically reiterating the prohibition for Jews to hold firearms, but made it easier for one party nazi regime to gain acquisition and transfer of rifles and shotguns, as was the possession of ammunition.
Groups of people who were exempt from the acquisition permit requirement expanded. Holders of annual hunting permits, government workers, and NSDAP members were no longer subject to gun ownership restrictions.
Boy this is starting to sound very familiar all you have to do is substitute a few names.

[Skipjack]

Nothing at all. You said nothing of worth or note at all.

Yes I did. Overall, guns were a lot easier to aquire and own for the majority of the population under Hitler than they were under the previous, conservative regime.
That is a fact.

Only the political opposition was disarmed. Good idea?

Look, I am not saying that it was a good thing. I am just saying that compared to the conservative regime before, guns were a lot easier to acquire for a majority of the population. Overall the gun laws were wastly RELAXED compared to the earlier conservative regime, which pretty much barred anyone from owning guns.
Whether it was fair, or not, it was still more liberal. That was my point. Now, I guess one could argue about the circumstances or motives, but that is a completely different discussion.

[hanelyp]

http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2013/07/10/ne ... -protests/

Judicial Watch announced today that it has obtained documents proving that the Department of Justice played a major behind-the-scenes role in organizing protests against George Zimmerman. Zimmerman is on trial for second-degree murder in the shooting death of Trayvon Martin in February 2012.

Judicial Watch filed a Freedom of Information Act request with the DOJ on April 24, 2012. According to the documents JW received, a little-known DOJ unit called the Community Relations Service deployed to Sanford, FL, to organize and manage rallies against Zimmerman.

Corrupt, beginning to end.

[ladajo]

How long for mainstream to pick it up?

[Stubby]

no link to the docs?