New Surveilance Tech - Stingray

Discuss life, the universe, and everything with other members of this site. Get to know your fellow polywell enthusiasts.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

Post Reply
MSimon
Posts: 14335
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Rockford, Illinois
Contact:

New Surveilance Tech - Stingray

Post by MSimon »

http://www.theweedblog.com/feds-new-cel ... -concerns/

Don't go there if you object to seeing things you don't want to see.
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.

choff
Posts: 2447
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 5:02 am
Location: Vancouver, Canada

Re: New Surveilance Tech - Stingray

Post by choff »

So eventually civilian police tracking and monitoring tech will get just as good, same with civilian UAV's and then both sides will hate it equally, and both sides will agree to stop it.
CHoff

kcdodd
Posts: 722
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 3:36 am
Location: Austin, TX

Re: New Surveilance Tech - Stingray

Post by kcdodd »

Makes me not even want a cell phone anymore.
Carter

MSimon
Posts: 14335
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Rockford, Illinois
Contact:

Re: New Surveilance Tech - Stingray

Post by MSimon »

kcdodd wrote:Makes me not even want a cell phone anymore.
I know a former NSA guy who only uses old cell phones and prefers old cars. I figure he knows something.
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.

kcdodd
Posts: 722
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 3:36 am
Location: Austin, TX

Re: New Surveilance Tech - Stingray

Post by kcdodd »

I guess with an old phone the most they could do is get your location. Versus getting emails, texts,etc
Carter

choff
Posts: 2447
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 5:02 am
Location: Vancouver, Canada

Re: New Surveilance Tech - Stingray

Post by choff »

Old style cell phones are cheaper and usually have cheaper plans, but after getting used to driving in a car equipped with airbags I don't feel comfortable drivng in one that just has seatbelts, chipped or not.
CHoff

MSimon
Posts: 14335
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Rockford, Illinois
Contact:

Re: New Surveilance Tech - Stingray

Post by MSimon »

choff wrote:Old style cell phones are cheaper and usually have cheaper plans, but after getting used to driving in a car equipped with airbags I don't feel comfortable drivng in one that just has seatbelts, chipped or not.
If you use the seat belts religiously they provide 95% of the protection of airbags + seat belts.

And of course if you are not wearing the seat belts to keep you in position in a crash airbags are not near as much help as touted.

So how much safety would you give up to be free of surveillance?
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.

kcdodd
Posts: 722
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 3:36 am
Location: Austin, TX

Re: New Surveilance Tech - Stingray

Post by kcdodd »

In terms of just safety, you should probably give up the fancier cell phones anyway. I nearly got in a wreck once just because the ringer went off and I glanced over at the phone. Didn't even need to be checking my friends status on facebook.
Carter

choff
Posts: 2447
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 5:02 am
Location: Vancouver, Canada

Re: New Surveilance Tech - Stingray

Post by choff »

I've walked away from a low speed head on, so it's more accident phobia than police state paranoia at work. The more annoying thing about microchipped new cars is the PPP toll(troll) bridges that will use them, even if people put a polarized filter over the license plate to beat the camera. I avoid using those bridges on principle, but if the surveillance state wants to read over my shoulder, let'm, they'll turn on their masters if they do.
CHoff

Post Reply