Talk-Polywell.org Forum Index Talk-Polywell.org
a discussion forum for Polywell fusion
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Latest from MSNBC 02 May 008
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Talk-Polywell.org Forum Index -> News
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Keegan



Joined: 17 Aug 2007
Posts: 206
Location: Brisbane, Australia

PostPosted: Tue May 06, 2008 5:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dr Nebel, at the moment the DoD is picking up the tab for WB7. If they are paying for it, do they own any of it ? I believe EMC2 is the owner of several key patents on the polywell system, but i also believe that any US patents can be aquired in the interests of national security.

You mentioned the contract is to August. Logically future DoD contracts are pending WB7 results/review. So if all is well, this will most likely leave the DoD funding the next few iterations of WB.

Its nice to know your vision is inline with Dr Bussard's richeous idealism. Although a reasonable person could suggest that the DoD may not share such views. Especially while its mounting such an expensive campaign in the middle east.

We know its going to be a long road to net power. As outputs improve, one can expect the powers that be, will flex some muscle. In that case we have a precedent where keeping things open will get things accomplished in 5 years instead of 10.

Something new just "clicks" everyday. It is an amazing concept. Alas, The question in my mind is not "Is this going to work ?"

but "whats gonna happen next ?"

rnebel wrote:
We’re focused on getting the WB-7 to work first.


It cant be easy, Godspeed to you Sir.
_________________
Purity is Power
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rnebel



Joined: 24 Dec 2007
Posts: 144

PostPosted: Tue May 06, 2008 4:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm not sure that I know the answers to all of your questions, but I'll tell you what I do know. First of all EMC2 owns the patents and the commercialization rights. DOD retains the right to use the technology free of charge. That's a pretty standard arrangement.

As for DOD taking control of the technology, I think that's pretty unlikely. The most similar parallel to this that I can think of was the development of fission power. Both nuclear fission propulsion and commercial power were developed in parallel. It isn't a coincidence that both systems are LWRs. I expect a similar situation here. Everyone that I have talked to at the DOD understands that energy supply is a major national security issue. It's not in the national interest of the US to keep this technology from going commercial. Furthermore, this project has never been classified. Fusion research world-wide was declassified in 1958 by international treaty.

Finally, I appreciate your concern about research being slowed down by the lack of dialogue. My previous research at LANL (POPS for instance) was always public domain. The reason we did it that way is because we figured that the patents would run out before we could commercialize it and the benefits of having it critiqued outweighed the drawbacks of getting "scooped". I still feel that way, but I have a little different responsibilities at EMC2. We have a responsibility to get this technology developed in a timely manner and I also have a responsibility to look after the interests of our employees and the corporation.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MSimon



Joined: 16 Jul 2007
Posts: 6761
Location: Rockford, Illinois

PostPosted: Wed May 07, 2008 3:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

rnebel,

The fact that you are collecting time domain information is a really great improvement over the crude data collection done on WB-6.

In my proposal for a continuously operating test reactor (I called it WB-7x) time domain collection of data was an important part of my proposal.

My hat is off to you and your team sir. Top notch. And to be doing all you are doing with such a relatively small budget. Excellent. Too much money has a way of killing projects that is often unrecognized. I'm hoping you are in that sweet spot of just a little too much (to take advantage of the unexpected and to also be able to repair the unexpected).

Have you considered renting a real time spectrum analyzer such as:

http://www.tek.com/products/spectrum_analyzers/

http://www.tek.com/products/spectrum_analyzers/rsa3000/

http://www.tek.com/products/spectrum_analyzers/rsa6100a/

when you get to the point where such data would be useful in order to get a better handle on the inner workings of the plasma?
_________________
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
rnebel



Joined: 24 Dec 2007
Posts: 144

PostPosted: Wed May 07, 2008 9:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

M. Simon:

Thanks for the links. We do have spectrum analyzers in our data system. I suspect that these will be of increasing value as we get more sophisiticated diagnostics
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
laksindiaforfusion



Joined: 16 Feb 2008
Posts: 22

PostPosted: Thu May 08, 2008 12:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Dr Nebel,

I have a quick question:

If EMC2 demonstrates a significant commercialization possibility with IEC, what is the chance that it can be exported to private operators in countries such as India or China? Does the DoD prevent that?

Hopefully this is an ok question to ask!

Thanks
_________________
The believer's burden and a skeptics purpose
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
MSimon



Joined: 16 Jul 2007
Posts: 6761
Location: Rockford, Illinois

PostPosted: Thu May 08, 2008 1:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

rnebel,

The spectrum analyzers I linked to are special in that they can analyze pulses as short as about 11 uSec. You are limited to a 15 MHz or 30 MHz band but the band can be any where in the DC to 40 GHz range (depending on the analyzer).

They came on the market due to the need to analyze devices such as Bluetooth and zigbee.
_________________
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
gblaze42



Joined: 30 Jul 2007
Posts: 227

PostPosted: Thu May 08, 2008 6:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

rnebel wrote:
I'm not sure that I know the answers to all of your questions, but I'll tell you what I do know. First of all EMC2 owns the patents and the commercialization rights. DOD retains the right to use the technology free of charge. That's a pretty standard arrangement.

As for DOD taking control of the technology, I think that's pretty unlikely. The most similar parallel to this that I can think of was the development of fission power. Both nuclear fission propulsion and commercial power were developed in parallel. It isn't a coincidence that both systems are LWRs. I expect a similar situation here. Everyone that I have talked to at the DOD understands that energy supply is a major national security issue. It's not in the national interest of the US to keep this technology from going commercial. Furthermore, this project has never been classified. Fusion research world-wide was declassified in 1958 by international treaty.

Finally, I appreciate your concern about research being slowed down by the lack of dialogue. My previous research at LANL (POPS for instance) was always public domain. The reason we did it that way is because we figured that the patents would run out before we could commercialize it and the benefits of having it critiqued outweighed the drawbacks of getting "scooped". I still feel that way, but I have a little different responsibilities at EMC2. We have a responsibility to get this technology developed in a timely manner and I also have a responsibility to look after the interests of our employees and the corporation.


Dr. Nebel,

I certainly am glad you take the time to answer peoples questions. I'm curious about one thing, if the information from WB-7 shows that Bussard was correct in his readings from WB-6, what is the next step? Will the Navy continue on developing this technology? or will EMC2?

Thank you for continuing on with DR. Bussards work! He was one of the few scientists that I believe, wasn't afraid to push boundaries and think big.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rnebel



Joined: 24 Dec 2007
Posts: 144

PostPosted: Thu May 08, 2008 9:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

general answers:

We don't see major issues to exporting the technology. Right now any follow-ons to the WB-7 are up in the air. We have time resolution down to the sub-microsecond range. That's pretty typical for magnetic fusion experiments. That gives resolution down to the ion inertial timescale.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gblaze42



Joined: 30 Jul 2007
Posts: 227

PostPosted: Fri May 09, 2008 3:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

rnebel wrote:
general answers:

We don't see major issues to exporting the technology. Right now any follow-ons to the WB-7 are up in the air. We have time resolution down to the sub-microsecond range. That's pretty typical for magnetic fusion experiments. That gives resolution down to the ion inertial timescale.


Thanks!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
laksindiaforfusion



Joined: 16 Feb 2008
Posts: 22

PostPosted: Fri May 09, 2008 7:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

rnebel wrote:
general answers:

We don't see major issues to exporting the technology. Right now any follow-ons to the WB-7 are up in the air. We have time resolution down to the sub-microsecond range. That's pretty typical for magnetic fusion experiments. That gives resolution down to the ion inertial timescale.


Thanks for taking time to reply.
_________________
The believer's burden and a skeptics purpose
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
zbarlici



Joined: 17 Jul 2007
Posts: 171
Location: winnipeg, canada

PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 8:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dr. Nebel realize that should this polywell work his name will go down in history. Just a thought.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
MSimon



Joined: 16 Jul 2007
Posts: 6761
Location: Rockford, Illinois

PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 9:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gentlemen,

We are all making history here. Even the lurkers.
_________________
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
MrE



Joined: 24 Apr 2008
Posts: 22
Location: Morro Bay, California

PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 9:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lurker reporting for duty! *salutes*

I have been a busy little bee drawing the first wall and magrid in Autocad '06. I have been making the shapes in 3-d there then opening them in 3d studio max '09 for animation and texturing.

I also have been soldering/constructing an RF power source which can be used to grow the first wall materials in the shapes I have drawn in software.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXHjAf6POKE
Similar to the above video by a German Enthusiast.

Lurker over-and-out.

:-)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TallDave



Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 2040

PostPosted: Wed May 14, 2008 7:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Heh. Well, we're only making history if this actually pans out into a commercially viable energy producing technology.

Otherwise, we're making a very, very small footnote to history.

Still, Polywell's a legitimate shot at changing the world, which is why I keep checking this every day to see if Dr. Nebel has favored us with any new developments or discoveries that might illuminate which way things will fall out.

Nice video, MrE. I could almost smell the ozone!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Talk-Polywell.org Forum Index -> News All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group