vankirkc wrote:GIThruster wrote:There is also the issue that the argument being made does not argue for Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW). It's an argument for Climate Change--as there is no mechanism described whereby the proposed change in climate is wrought by human affairs.
The article mentions overfishing as one possible cause of the decline in plankton. The logic was a decline in larger fish meant less zoo plankton was being consumed, who in turn consumed more of the plant plankton.
Your missing his point, he was pointing out that even if the article you reference is entirely correct about the warming indicator, it says NOTHING about the cause of said warming and so says NOTHING about AGW.