FIRST FUSION!!!!!!!!!!!
FIRST FUSION!!!!!!!!!!!
Great news!!!!!!!!!
Prometheus Fusion Perfection has FUSED THE ATOM.
Take a look at the bubbles:
http://prometheusfusionperfection.com/2 ... st-fusion/
I'm so happy and so excited. This is the start of amazing things!
Prometheus Fusion Perfection has FUSED THE ATOM.
Take a look at the bubbles:
http://prometheusfusionperfection.com/2 ... st-fusion/
I'm so happy and so excited. This is the start of amazing things!
Be careful you're not just measuring background there. You can leave one of these things open for a day and it'll read a couple of bubbles just from cosmic radiations.
What I would say is that it is in keeping with EMC2/Bussard neutron detection rates!
What I would say is that it is in keeping with EMC2/Bussard neutron detection rates!
Last edited by chrismb on Fri Nov 20, 2009 11:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
It's an emulsion of low temperature boiling points halomethanes like R-12 or R-22 (refrigerant liquid) with an ethylene/polyethilene matrix.IntLibber wrote:ok whats the bubble about?
This liquid emulsion has the characteristic that keeps his liquid state at a temperature higher than it's boiling temperature, and hence is called "superheated".
Uh. One in any given short period (250 uSec) might be background. Three is rather above probability.chrismb wrote:Be careful you're not just measuring background there. You can leave one of these things open for a day and it'll read a couple of bubbles just from cosmic radiations.
What I would say is that it is in keeping with EMC2/Bussard neutron detection rates!
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.
-
- Posts: 815
- Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 4:03 pm
- Location: UK
On Chris's figure of 2 per day and your time slice of 250 uSec, I make it a 1 in 57600 chance of 3 detections being no more than background.MSimon wrote:Uh. One in any given short period (250 uSec) might be background. Three is rather above probability.chrismb wrote:Be careful you're not just measuring background there. You can leave one of these things open for a day and it'll read a couple of bubbles just from cosmic radiations.
What I would say is that it is in keeping with EMC2/Bussard neutron detection rates!
Ars artis est celare artem.
-
- Posts: 815
- Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 4:03 pm
- Location: UK
That sound right. Or at least close enough to zero so that it doesn't matter.alexjrgreen wrote:1-((1-p)^3)MSimon wrote:There are 172,800,000 1/4 mSec in 12 hours.
How did you come up with your probability number?
I misread u for m, so the figure should be 1 in 57,600,000.
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.
Add to that ~3 tests, means ~ 1 in 150,000,000 (?) chance that all the neutron counts were background. I don't know what the background counts from noise (electronics) would be, but I imagine that it would swamp the natural background counts, eg- a purely made up number- there might ba a 1 in 1000 chance that the counts were all noise.MSimon wrote:That sound right. Or at least close enough to zero so that it doesn't matter.alexjrgreen wrote:1-((1-p)^3)MSimon wrote:There are 172,800,000 1/4 mSec in 12 hours.
How did you come up with your probability number?
I misread u for m, so the figure should be 1 in 57,600,000.
Dan Tibbets
To error is human... and I'm very human.