Flywheels For The Navy
Flywheels For The Navy
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.
Formula One racing is putting a push on for KERS systems. At the moment most of the teams are using battery based systems, but the feeling is that flywheel systems have greater potential, if the bugs can be worked out.
Those guys in the pressure cooker of competition and for the love of their sport are among the great innovators of our time. The investment that folk like Honda have put in to the sport has resulted in great things for their production vehicles. Sadly we here in the US enjoy watching hulking beaters roar around the track, in a most degenerate fashion. Well, at least I do.
Those guys in the pressure cooker of competition and for the love of their sport are among the great innovators of our time. The investment that folk like Honda have put in to the sport has resulted in great things for their production vehicles. Sadly we here in the US enjoy watching hulking beaters roar around the track, in a most degenerate fashion. Well, at least I do.
On a related topic, the new Ford Class carrier will have an EMALS launch system instead of steam catapults:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromag ... nch_System
Discharge rates of 30+ MJ/sec (100MJ in less than 3 seconds). In VA terms - how about 10,000V@3,000A.
I think that solves the rate issues of mechanical storage to electrical power conversion!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromag ... nch_System
Discharge rates of 30+ MJ/sec (100MJ in less than 3 seconds). In VA terms - how about 10,000V@3,000A.
I think that solves the rate issues of mechanical storage to electrical power conversion!
not tall, not raving (yet...)
Shouldn't we look to much lower voltage and higher amps? If we super-chill the magnet, that is the desire, no?David_Jay wrote:On a related topic, the new Ford Class carrier will have an EMALS launch system instead of steam catapults:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromag ... nch_System
Discharge rates of 30+ MJ/sec (100MJ in less than 3 seconds). In VA terms - how about 10,000V@3,000A.
I think that solves the rate issues of mechanical storage to electrical power conversion!
Oh yeah, and that honker is HUGE!
My VA illustration was only to translate MJ into something more people can identify with - you could just as well say 1,000,000V@30A or 100V@300,000A
Have you seen a size for a disk alternator? I haven't been able to track down that information.
The size quoted is for the entire catapult, which is obviously big enough to launch an E-3 and more.
Have you seen a size for a disk alternator? I haven't been able to track down that information.
The size quoted is for the entire catapult, which is obviously big enough to launch an E-3 and more.
not tall, not raving (yet...)
More detail here, but no size for the flywheel, which turns @6000RPM in a vacuum vessel:
http://www.edn.com/contents/images/207108.pdf
http://www.edn.com/contents/images/207108.pdf
not tall, not raving (yet...)
from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flywheel_energy_storageFor the basic physics of a flywheel, see Flywheel Physics.
Compared with other ways of storing electricity, FES systems have long lifetimes (lasting decades with little or no maintenance[2]; full-cycle lifetimes quoted for flywheels range from in excess of 105, up to 107, cycles of use)[4], high energy densities (~ 130 W·h/kg, or ~ 500 kJ/kg), and large maximum power outputs. The energy efficiency (ratio of energy out per energy in) of flywheels can be as high as 90%. Typical capacities range from 3 kWh to 133 kWh.[2]Rapid charging of a system occurs in less than 15 minutes.[5]
At 500 kJ / kg, I calculate 200 kg, but that seems awfully small.
Aero
From the second reference in the wiki EMALS article above :Aero wrote:from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flywheel_energy_storage
At 500 kJ / kg, I calculate 200 kg, but that seems awfully small.
This is SIGNIFICANTLY less than the 500kJ/kg in the "flywheel" article. Oh, and it doesn't include the cooling unit, or the..., or the..., or the...This gives an energy density of 18.1 KJ/KG, excluding the torque frame.
The lower density may be a function of high pulse power output. i.e. the hardware must be more robust to handle the peak torque. Love to have one of these to kick start the BFG. Crank up your 1 MW DG. Warm it for a few minutes. Start loading the flywheel - 1 minute to load - kick the BFR. Wheeeeee!!!!KitemanSA wrote:From the second reference in the wiki EMALS article above :Aero wrote:from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flywheel_energy_storage
At 500 kJ / kg, I calculate 200 kg, but that seems awfully small.This is SIGNIFICANTLY less than the 500kJ/kg in the "flywheel" article. Oh, and it doesn't include the cooling unit, or the..., or the..., or the...This gives an energy density of 18.1 KJ/KG, excluding the torque frame.
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.
If the power delivered can be matched to the voltage and current required this might be a nice cheap way of getting short run controlled power. A HV xfmr and a bunch of diodes. I wonder what a 5 MW for 2 second unit costs?KitemanSA wrote:Talk to General Atomics, they may be happy to unload one on you.
On the other hand, Beacon Power is one of several companies that are making much smaller but compoundable flywheel storage units with impressive power outputs for several seconds to minutes.
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.
This is the Pentadyne unit. For some reason, the data on the Beacon Power system is being updated without leaving the past data there.MSimon wrote: If the power delivered can be matched to the voltage and current required this might be a nice cheap way of getting short run controlled power. A HV xfmr and a bunch of diodes. I wonder what a 5 MW for 2 second unit costs?
They show 1000kVA for 14 seconds with 5 cabinets. $, they don't say on the web site.DC input/output voltage --------- Adjustable: 350 to 850* Vdc
Maximum output power --------- 190 kW
Recharging time ----------------- <15 sec. (DC source dependent)
DC ripple ------------------------- <2%
DC output voltage regulation --- ±1% steady state
Standby draw/heat dissipation - 0.3 kW/1,025 BTU/hr
Weight ---------------------------- 1,300 pounds (590 kg)
Dimensions D xW x H ----------- 33x25x71 in (83x63x180 cm)
Operating sound level ----------- 45 dBA@1 meter
Operating temperature range -- -4°F to 122°F (0°C to 50°C)
Cabling access ------------------- Top or side
Service access ------------------- Only front access required