TDPerk wrote:You have yet to demonstrate anything but pathological skepticism as backing up your assertion the existing evidence is not adequate.
Before you continue to so much as mention Rossi as being any sort of equivalent, I suggest you actually look at Woddward's, et al's, experimental protocols and the capabilities of their equipment.
I thought I was very clear in my posts, but I'll try again. I think Woodward's work is some of the best given the subject, however; there are 2 obstacles that will continue to leave me skeptical until they're addressed. The first, not every replication attempt has been successful. This in itself isn't that bad , because sometimes people make mistakes replicating and I accept that possibility. The second, Dr. Fern has acknowledged that their thrust measurements are on the absolute fringe of what their equipment can detect. She has acknowledged this a few times in the videos posted here and elsewhere. When you're working on the absolute fringe of our equipment ability, you're opening yourself to potential errors. That is not to say their measurements are errors, but I would like to see more evidence. My position is completely reasonable and not pathological at all.
Now, for your response quoted above. Instead of taking the time to read that I actually like Woodward's work, but want more evidence, you jumped to some conclusion that I've already dismissed the claim. I have not. I simply want more evidence than fringe measurements and hit or miss replications. I honestly think Woodward will deliver, whether positive or negative. So before you go trying to label a person, perhaps you should take a moment to read and understand what has been posted. Hell, my posts directed to you were cautionary in the sense that you were starting to sound like parallel. With the quote above, I could easily insert that into the LENR discussion and people would think it is from Parallel. You went from starting to sound like him so sounding exactly like him.