The way the AGW Crowd Adresses Issues

Discuss life, the universe, and everything with other members of this site. Get to know your fellow polywell enthusiasts.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

Post Reply
Jccarlton
Posts: 1747
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 6:14 pm
Location: Southern Ct

The way the AGW Crowd Adresses Issues

Post by Jccarlton »


Schneibster
Posts: 1805
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
Location: Monterey, CA, USA

Re: The way the AGW Crowd Adresses Issues

Post by Schneibster »

With quotes, charts, and links.

Like this one:

Image

And with logical argument.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.

Diogenes
Posts: 6976
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 3:33 pm

Re: The way the AGW Crowd Adresses Issues

Post by Diogenes »



What, do you think these people have any talent or real jobs outside of government teat sucking?

Liberals do what they do because most of them are incompetent at real world problems and so needs must turn to the government to make any sort of living at all.


Propaganda is something they can do because it only requires an infantile mind to produce it or believe it.


Liberals are fool herders.
‘What all the wise men promised has not happened, and what all the damned fools said would happen has come to pass.’
— Lord Melbourne —

Schneibster
Posts: 1805
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
Location: Monterey, CA, USA

Re: The way the AGW Crowd Adresses Issues

Post by Schneibster »

On the other hand, climate cranks try to get people in trouble for telling the truth, by lying.

Eventually, however, those pigs come home to roost.

The National Review and Willard "Tony" Watts are being sued for defamation and will almost certainly lose; and it's extremely unlikely Mann will accept any settlement whatever and intends to force them to apologize in public and pay all his lawyer costs, including for the five unnecessary investigations that proved him innocent. It's highly likely that the agencies will demand that National Review and Watts pay for their side of the investigations, too, since they were the ones who perjured themselves to law enforcement.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.

Post Reply