Talk-Polywell.org

Youtube vid copyright-claimed by Chris Mooney.
--
Is this the same footage?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPfuZUEbhfc

Looks like. Interesting. One hears often of these so called eyewitness testimonies, but I can't think of one from an employee at LockMart about what happens behind closed doors. I would here note to you, that although many science types discount this kind of evidence, we lock people up for their entire lives based on less. Personal testimony, especially from a witness coming clean when they're about to die, is generally reliable. There's little gain to be had here as most know, making these kinds of claims more often discredits someone than enhances their station, and what station could someone about to die be concerned with?

In his bag of tricks video I thought I identified a liquid nitrogen cooled superconductor magnet playing the levitation game. I also thought I saw a kitchen bowl that looked an awful lot like some of his flying saucer photos. Also curious his aliens were never standing up out in the open. Only against a wall as I recall.

Someone else watch the video and say what they think.

ladajo wrote:In his bag of tricks video I thought I identified a liquid nitrogen cooled superconductor magnet playing the levitation game. I also thought I saw a kitchen bowl that looked an awful lot like some of his flying saucer photos. Also curious his aliens were never standing up out in the open. Only against a wall as I recall.

Someone else watch the video and say what they think.

I watched it. Given the man's credentials, I thought I could spare some time hearing what he had to say.



The only thing he convinced me of is that he is probably a nut. He is especially wrong in thinking that his horrible photographs should have any evidentiary weight.


If his contacts were such as he claimed, why couldn't he get some decent high quality images?



He exhibits a cargo cult like desire to believe in this stuff. That's what I saw.

Well if there are all these speedy UFOs around where are the sonic booms? And why are the pictures always so grainy? And in this age of ubiquitous cameras why don't we see more photos?

There is something. But visitors from another planet? I'm not convinced. Even by deathbed confessions.

MSimon wrote:Well if there are all these speedy UFOs around where are the sonic booms?

There's no reason to suppose they would break the sound barrier but there are lots of sonic booms reported with no explanation.

MSimon wrote:And why are the pictures always so grainy?

They're not.

MSimon wrote:And in this age of ubiquitous cameras why don't we see more photos?

There are thousands of them. The trouble is really the reverse--how can you tell it's not photoshopped these days? Photos are not more convincing than they used to be; they're less.

OK. How about some links to ungrainy photos.

www.mufon.com I think is the web site your looking for.

paperburn1 wrote:http://www.mufon.com I think is the web site your looking for.

Didn't see anything of interest. Lots of long distance shots.

The photos Bushman is holding are plenty clear enough. It's easy to see what's in them. The question is their authenticity. There is no doubt about the subjects of the photos so clarity is not the issue. Veracity is the issue.

I'd note to you, there are hundreds of extremely clear photos taken of UFO's from around the world. You can look them whenever you like. Likewise there are plenty of incontestable radar tracks, such as that of the RB-47. http://www.ufocasebook.com/rb47.html This was tracked from ground and air for hours, and performed maneuvers that are still today impossible to all conventional aircraft.

Anyone who actually looks at the evidence for UFO's is going to become a believer. The evidence is completely compelling.

GIThruster wrote:Anyone who actually looks at the evidence for UFO's is going to become a believer. The evidence is completely compelling.

Gee, isn't that kind of what Axil says about LENR?

True, but at least on this site they try to vet the pictures and sources. Then they tag the fake ones just leaving the unexplained ones

Anyone who actually looks at the evidence for UFO's is going to become a believer. The evidence is completely compelling.

Well I have been looking at it off an on for 60 years or more and I'm a believer. There are UFOs. Although flying may be a stretch. So far I find no general explanation satisfactory. But who knows? They might be LGM from MOFO or what ever they call their planet.

I look forward to the day when we build our FTL (or wormhole) anti-gravity machine and visit them. I'll probably be pushing up daisies by then.

Is there intelligent life elsewhere in the universe? Likely.
Are there unexplained lights and so forth in the sky? Yes.

Are the unexplained lights alien spacecraft? Not nearly so clear. Among other factors, humans are demonstrated to be very poor at judging size or distance of unfamiliar objects.