Page 1 of 1
viable alternative source of energy compared to ITER
Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2014 5:42 am
by ohiovr
Like ITER, my idea is certainly possible! Instead of using a gigantic aircraft carrier sized building full of intense scientific instruments and gyrotron do dads, considerable cost savings can be attained by powering a steam turbine using orignal Picasso paintings as fuel. Yes the fuel would be kind of expensive however the emissions are pretty good and not only that, but it doesn't take a giant technological monster to make it work. By burning up Picasso we can finally attain true energy freedom!
Re: viable alternative source of energy compared to ITER
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 9:28 am
by MSimon
ohiovr wrote:Like ITER, my idea is certainly possible! Instead of using a gigantic aircraft carrier sized building full of intense scientific instruments and gyrotron do dads, considerable cost savings can be attained by powering a steam turbine using orignal Picasso paintings as fuel. Yes the fuel would be kind of expensive however the emissions are pretty good and not only that, but it doesn't take a giant technological monster to make it work. By burning up Picasso we can finally attain true energy freedom!
Pigassos are more numerous and renewable.
Re: viable alternative source of energy compared to ITER
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 11:55 am
by ohiovr
Re: viable alternative source of energy compared to ITER
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 12:18 pm
by MSimon
