Talk-Polywell.org

ladajo wrote:Yeah! Finally!

One less talking head idiot

ladajo wrote:Yeah! Finally!
One less talking head idiot

And all the rest of them left to go.
They ALL think like Piers Morgan, they just aren't so honest about it.

mvanwink5 wrote:

And all the rest of them left to go.
They ALL think like Piers Morgan, they just aren't so honest about it.

Diogenes, your humor had me rolling on the floor, my eyes went crossed. Thank you for that!

The New Republic recently put it this way: “He is a mastermind at the game of cheap provocation. This is what made him a star in the tabloid world, where shock value is news value and blatancy is currency. The trouble is that he has channeled the very same sensibility into his anti-gun campaign. You might call it tabloidism as activism, sensationally and recklessly applied.”

Mr. Morgan’s approach to gun regulation was more akin to King George III, peering down his nose at the unruly colonies and wondering how to bring the savages to heel. He might have wanted to recall that part of the reason the right to bear arms is codified in the Constitution is that Britain was trying to disarm the citizenry at the time.

it is the whole liberal progressive crowd with bullying hubris looking down their noses at the little people.

Diogenes wrote:They ALL think like Piers Morgan...

KitemanSA wrote:

Diogenes wrote:They ALL think like Piers Morgan...

Who?

This is VERY good news, especially considering the ruling comes from one of the most liberal courts in the country.


Via Breitbart:

Just weeks after striking down the San Diego County “good cause” requirement as burdensome to the exercise of the Second Amendment, the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals struck down Yolo County, CA’s requirement that a concealed carry applicant “prove they face a threat of violence or robbery” before being allowed to carry a gun.

According to The Sacramento Bee, the ruling came via an “unpublished memorandum” on March 5. The 3-judge panel that issued the memorandum is the same as that which issued the broader ruling against “good cause” on February 13.

As with the decision against “good cause,” the Ninth Circuit ruled that the Yolo County “policy impermissibly infringes on the Second Amendment right to bear arms in lawful self-defense.”

This ruling “effects only Yolo County directly” and “serves notice” to Yolo County Sheriff Ed Prieto that his policy of requiring concealed carry applicants to “prove they face a threat” is unconstitutional.