Talk-Polywell.org

Well, now it seem there is no consensus:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/11/ ... _ipcc.html

You mean other than 14,000 to 28?

Spammers don't understand reports.

The part I picked up on was,


Other IPCC scientists search for elusive physical evidence for such a lack of warming. One favorite explanation has it that the heat is "hiding in the deep ocean;" but the IPCC fails to explain that heat cannot transfer into the deep ocean without first passing through the shallow ocean, which has not warmed since 2003.

choff wrote:The part I picked up on was,


Other IPCC scientists search for elusive physical evidence for such a lack of warming. One favorite explanation has it that the heat is "hiding in the deep ocean;" but the IPCC fails to explain that heat cannot transfer into the deep ocean without first passing through the shallow ocean, which has not warmed since 2003.

If the heat is passing through it won't warm, duh.

More magic heat appearing out of nowhere.

Also provide links to peer-reviewed articles showing the "shallow ocean... has not warmed since 2003." I don't believe this claim.

So 14,000 to 1 is "better" than 14,000 to 28?

How, precisely?

And who precisely is this "non governmental scientist?" Roy Spencer who got the editor of Remote Sensing fired? Willard "Tony" Watts, who is being sued for defamation, along with the Competitive Enterprise Institute and the National Review?