Well, now it seem there is no consensus:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/11/ ... _ipcc.html
Non governmental Scientist Slam IPCC Report
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: Non governmental Scientist Slam IPCC Report
You mean other than 14,000 to 28?
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
Re: Non governmental Scientist Slam IPCC Report
Spammers don't understand reports.
Re: Non governmental Scientist Slam IPCC Report
The part I picked up on was,
Other IPCC scientists search for elusive physical evidence for such a lack of warming. One favorite explanation has it that the heat is "hiding in the deep ocean;" but the IPCC fails to explain that heat cannot transfer into the deep ocean without first passing through the shallow ocean, which has not warmed since 2003.
Other IPCC scientists search for elusive physical evidence for such a lack of warming. One favorite explanation has it that the heat is "hiding in the deep ocean;" but the IPCC fails to explain that heat cannot transfer into the deep ocean without first passing through the shallow ocean, which has not warmed since 2003.
CHoff
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: Non governmental Scientist Slam IPCC Report
If the heat is passing through it won't warm, duh.choff wrote:The part I picked up on was,
Other IPCC scientists search for elusive physical evidence for such a lack of warming. One favorite explanation has it that the heat is "hiding in the deep ocean;" but the IPCC fails to explain that heat cannot transfer into the deep ocean without first passing through the shallow ocean, which has not warmed since 2003.
More magic heat appearing out of nowhere.
Also provide links to peer-reviewed articles showing the "shallow ocean... has not warmed since 2003." I don't believe this claim.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: Non governmental Scientist Slam IPCC Report
So 14,000 to 1 is "better" than 14,000 to 28?
How, precisely?
And who precisely is this "non governmental scientist?" Roy Spencer who got the editor of Remote Sensing fired? Willard "Tony" Watts, who is being sued for defamation, along with the Competitive Enterprise Institute and the National Review?
How, precisely?
And who precisely is this "non governmental scientist?" Roy Spencer who got the editor of Remote Sensing fired? Willard "Tony" Watts, who is being sued for defamation, along with the Competitive Enterprise Institute and the National Review?
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.