Talk-Polywell.org

and a coward who has no honor and will not answer when given the lie.

You said,

TDPerk wrote:You are spamming us with fairy tales about how human released CO2 is somehow different from other CO2,

This is an outright lie. You said it here: viewtopic.php?f=8&t=4895&start=15#p107153

I never said this, never claimed it once. You made this up. It's a fantasy. You haven't read what I think and don't care; your only concern is to harass me until I go away.

Why are you here? You don't want to know the truth.

Next time try to fix it so the first sentence of your post isn't a lie.

I'm not here to pet you and tell you you won again no matter how bad you did.

I can be immediately and easily be proven wrong by TDPerk posting where I claimed there were "different kinds of CO2[sic]."

Three possible such "differences" exist:
1. Different isotopes of oxygen.
2. Different isotopes of carbon.
3. There might be different sources; however, other than the isotopes, there shouldn't be any "different CO2[sic]."

As far as I'm aware the closest I've come to mentioning any of these is when I mentioned the δO18 proxy for temperature. And I mentioned radiocarbon; but never as a component of CO2.

This individual is now "doubling down," pretending no evidence is necessary to support its claim. Attempting to support its lie with more bigger lies.

It's quite colorful. Pretty ugly though.

"Different CO2[sic]" my azz.

Just so we remember:

TDPerk wrote:You are spamming us with fairy tales about how human released CO2 is somehow different from other CO2,

This is an outright lie. You said it here: viewtopic.php?f=8&t=4895&start=15#p107153

There just isn't anything to say here. I never said that, I never intended to say that, and I never wanted to say that. You lied when you claimed I said it, and that's the truth, period. There isn't anywhere to hide with your BS.