Who The Heck Do You Want Reviewing It, Non-Experts?
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 11:03 pm
I mean, this is duh.
Come on, what are you talking about? Do you really think the people who are involved in the same science aren't the best available to review it? Science is supposed to be skeptical. What's all this whining?
What, do you want to get a croupier to tell you the final resting position of the marble on the roulette wheel?
Tea leaves?
The Babble???
What's your problem here?
It's reality, and the best method for finding it so far has always turned out to be the experts' collective opinion. All other methods have resulted in error, often egregious error up to and including burning people like Giordano Bruno alive. With his tongue nailed to the roof of his mouth so he couldn't scream, are you proud of that?
Come on, what are you talking about? Do you really think the people who are involved in the same science aren't the best available to review it? Science is supposed to be skeptical. What's all this whining?
What, do you want to get a croupier to tell you the final resting position of the marble on the roulette wheel?
Tea leaves?
The Babble???
What's your problem here?
It's reality, and the best method for finding it so far has always turned out to be the experts' collective opinion. All other methods have resulted in error, often egregious error up to and including burning people like Giordano Bruno alive. With his tongue nailed to the roof of his mouth so he couldn't scream, are you proud of that?