I mean, this is duh.
Come on, what are you talking about? Do you really think the people who are involved in the same science aren't the best available to review it? Science is supposed to be skeptical. What's all this whining?
What, do you want to get a croupier to tell you the final resting position of the marble on the roulette wheel?
Tea leaves?
The Babble???
What's your problem here?
It's reality, and the best method for finding it so far has always turned out to be the experts' collective opinion. All other methods have resulted in error, often egregious error up to and including burning people like Giordano Bruno alive. With his tongue nailed to the roof of his mouth so he couldn't scream, are you proud of that?
Who The Heck Do You Want Reviewing It, Non-Experts?
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Who The Heck Do You Want Reviewing It, Non-Experts?
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.