Talk-Polywell.org

Let's start here:

http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2 ... e_recovery

Then we can move on to here:

http://www.truth-out.org/buzzflash/comm ... guantanamo

And here:

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2 ... otage.html

Neither Foreign Policy nor Daily Beast are by any means liberal. This seems to be a consensus among both liberal and conservative sources.

You keep harping about the Tea Party. But, there are connections between it and your people:
http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/2012/01 ... -plan.html

Politics at the interface between the touching left and right wingtips of the political turkey (a low-dimensional, simply-connected, first-order, linear approximation for those who insist on "models").

I don't see a linguine spine national defense as a core TEA party value.

Ron Paul, depending on the issue, ranges from 100% right, to dangerously wrong, to "what the Bleep?"

DeltaV wrote:You keep harping about the Tea Party. But, there are connections between it and your people:
http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/2012/01 ... -plan.html

Politics at the interface between the touching left and right wingtips of the political turkey (a low-dimensional, simply-connected, first-order, linear approximation for those who insist on "models").

Libertardian "they're all the same" propaganda spotted. Deflector shields raised.

hanelyp wrote:I don't see a linguine spine national defense as a core TEA party value.

Ron Paul, depending on the issue, ranges from 100% right, to dangerously wrong, to "what the Bleep?"

Not to mention he's a racist.