Talk-Polywell.org

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/10/21/p ... k-of-xxxx/
“Lastly, the “crock of xxxx” statement was focussed entirely on recent work By Michael Mann w.r.t. hypothesised missing rings in tree-ring records (a whole bunch of papers listed below).

Although a rather flippant statement, I stand by it and Mann is well aware of my criticisms (privately and through the peer reviewed literature) of his recent work.

Rob”
I think that sums up most of Mann's career.

So is that MD "scientists," BS "scientists," or electronics technician "scientists?"

Just askin'.

Meanwhile getting your stuff published is the peer community's judgement on you and he's never had any trouble.

How 'bout you?

Last but not least peer review is not a popularity contest. People who obviously turn it into one don't get asked to review anything else.