Page 1 of 1
White House pushes General Aviation toward China model
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 4:57 pm
by DeltaV
http://www.aopa.org/advocacy/articles/2 ... le-ga.html
The White House on April 10 released a budget proposal that includes a $100-per-flight user fee—a charge AOPA warns could be disastrous for general aviation.
http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articl ... wn-378632/
For years China has hinted about opening lower airspace, but the People's Liberation Army still jealously guards access to China's airspace. While a major leadership change is set to happen in Beijing later this year, the situation is unlikely to improve soon. Although industry observers note the scattered signs of easing restrictions in selected zones within the country, the airspace below 10,000ft (3,000m) remains firmly in lockdown mode.
Re: White House pushes General Aviation toward China model
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 8:57 pm
by paperburn1
DeltaV wrote:http://www.aopa.org/advocacy/articles/2 ... le-ga.html
The White House on April 10 released a budget proposal that includes a $100-per-flight user fee—a charge AOPA warns could be disastrous for general aviation.
http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articl ... wn-378632/
For years China has hinted about opening lower airspace, but the People's Liberation Army still jealously guards access to China's airspace. While a major leadership change is set to happen in Beijing later this year, the situation is unlikely to improve soon. Although industry observers note the scattered signs of easing restrictions in selected zones within the country, the airspace below 10,000ft (3,000m) remains firmly in lockdown mode.
I will not be flying anymore it that happens..... can barely afford a 152 wet as it is.
Re: White House pushes General Aviation toward China model
Posted: Fri Apr 12, 2013 11:27 pm
by GIThruster
I will not be flying anymore it that happens..... can barely afford a 152 wet as it is.
I think it would mean the death of the entire General Aviation industry. You're in the same place as probably 95% of al GA pilots. Of those who can afford such a tax, mainly jet pilots I would think; many of them would be forced out of the industry because of the ripple effects. Most fixed base operators would go out of business and them who will work on what's left of the industry.
Hard for me to believe anyone would take this notion seriously, unless the attempt was actually to drive most of GA into the Light Sport Pilot base, with cheaper more fuel efficient planes. But even that is a deliberately destructive thing to do and I just can't believe anyone would think this wise.
Re: White House pushes General Aviation toward China model
Posted: Fri Apr 12, 2013 11:28 pm
by GIThruster
paperburn1 wrote:DeltaV wrote:http://www.aopa.org/advocacy/articles/2 ... le-ga.html
The White House on April 10 released a budget proposal that includes a $100-per-flight user fee—a charge AOPA warns could be disastrous for general aviation.
http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articl ... wn-378632/
For years China has hinted about opening lower airspace, but the People's Liberation Army still jealously guards access to China's airspace. While a major leadership change is set to happen in Beijing later this year, the situation is unlikely to improve soon. Although industry observers note the scattered signs of easing restrictions in selected zones within the country, the airspace below 10,000ft (3,000m) remains firmly in lockdown mode.
I will not be flying anymore it that happens..... can barely afford a 152 wet as it is.