Page 1 of 1
Obama=Carter, Embassy Security Failure Deja Vu
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 4:23 pm
by mvanwink5
Difference is they are killing the embassy personnel with Obama in charge, even the ambassador! The parallel is too eerie, in all respects.
Best regards
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 4:53 pm
by seedload
US Embassies have been attacked more than 20 times in the last 50 years. Why is this more similar to the Iran hostage crisis than any of the other 20+ attacks?
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 5:01 pm
by mvanwink5
No marines, local Libyans were the provided security. Do a little reading first. Hillary Clinton should resign at the minimum for not providing safety for her staff. I bet her protection is different. Whatever.
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 5:04 pm
by mvanwink5
By the way, the last US ambassador killed was in 1979, and when was Jimmy Carter President?
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 5:29 pm
by Stubby
what are you really trying to say?
i could make assumptions but you are rather good at ambiguity
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 5:53 pm
by mvanwink5
I'm just pissed off and blaming the asshole bosses who make sure they themselves are protected. #@!%&
Best regards
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2012 4:12 am
by mvanwink5
mvanwink5 wrote:Hillary Clinton should resign at the minimum for not providing safety for her staff. I bet her protection is different. Whatever.
Looks like Hillary's Obossman is sliding her under the bus...
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2012 10:30 pm
by hanelyp
In 1979-1980 the Iranians were not afraid of Carter. Come Reagan to office in January 1981, they changed their mind.
Today, thugs around the world are not afraid to provoke the occupier of the whitehouse. Hopefully that will change come January.
Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2012 8:06 pm
by ltgbrown
Do you Osama feels that way?
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 3:53 pm
by mvanwink5
Something very rotten is being brought to light. First, no security when it was known to be needed, then when the attack occurred, there was not support when requested.... Then to top it off, the mainstream news media is running cover for these whatever they are.
And why is Colin Powell endorsing this guy? I guess once a fool... And to think I once thought he should run. Good thing he didn't, he is a super dupe.
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2012 4:28 am
by hanelyp
Not just no backup when requested, reports that potential backup already in town was ordered to stand down. My guess is the idiot at the top didn't want any "provocative" American action.