A few weeks ago
Dr's Spencer and Brasswell published the results of the CERES satellite monitoring for the last decade or so, results which sort of made hash of the IPCC's climate change model. Well guess what, the editor of Remote Sensing has resigned, purportedly because he chose the "wrong" reviewers. I guess the climategate cabal is back in action, trying to suppress inconvient science, having learned nothing. I guess the elites need for AGW must overwrite reality.:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/09/02/b ... ell-paper/
More:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/09/03/r ... more-46581
http://lorenzo-thinkingoutaloud.blogspo ... ure.html#0
In my experience with them, computer models are more likely to be wrong than right. They should be used with great care and verified as much as possible with real data.
How "peer review" works in climate change
More on the antics of the climate cabal:
http://alfin2100.blogspot.com/2011/09/i ... s-not.html
Inquisition, not science
http://alfin2100.blogspot.com/2011/09/i ... s-not.html
Inquisition, not science