Page 1 of 4

Why you shouldn't "self-Medicate."

Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 3:26 pm
by Diogenes
Image


Image
With disturbing before and after photos of drug users’ faces, a new anti-drug campaign may succeed where others have failed, grabbing teens’ attentions by appealing to their vanity.

The pairs of mug shots, which graphically display the damage drugs can do to the face, were collected by the sheriff’s office in Multnomah County, Ore.


Story here.

More images here.



edited to improve format and add one picture.

Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:11 pm
by ladajo
Real life can suck.

State sanctioned drug escapism for everyone! Wheeee!

But you only qualify if you can prove you were an abused child.

Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:17 pm
by Skipjack
Holy!
Those are some ugly dudes and gals!

Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 11:19 pm
by D Tibbets
Skipjack wrote:Holy!
Those are some ugly dudes and gals!
True. Of course, what is not described is how lighting and posing can create a wide variation in appearance. Also, even a few years, especially under stress, but without drugs can result in significant differences. Pictures of presidents is a good example.

Dan Tibbets

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 12:43 am
by rjaypeters
But the numerous open sores on several of their faces indicate heavy methamphetamine use. US presidents tend to go gray, loose their hair and get all wrinkly.

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 1:27 am
by ladajo
I guess the point here is that excessive stress is not healthy. Go figure.
Now, be it drug induced or environmentally induced, it is still stress.

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 2:56 am
by D Tibbets
Not that this isn't good press for argueing against drug use to impresionable adolesents, but these individuals condition is perhaps as much to do with the social implications of their addictions, rather than the drugs themselves. Methamphetamine is a nasty drug, but mildly less harsh amphetamines are widely tolerated. Way too many children diagnosed with attention deficit disorder are fed amphetamines. And, many Dr Kildare types took huge amounts of amphetamines before their use was outlawed back in the 1950's-60's. Of course you then have to asked why they were outlawed then. And, of course you would then have to ask why they are being fed to children now. Other than the occasional stroke or heart attack, infections, hepititis, etc. the biggest significant point may not be taking the drug, but the dose you are taking, and what you have to do (to yourself or others) to get it.

While I have moralistic problems with handing out drugs to addicts, I sometimes wonder if it is less costly to society, and occasionally beneficial to the addict, to do this, as some European countries do.

Dan Tibbets

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 3:21 pm
by Diogenes
D Tibbets wrote:Not that this isn't good press for argueing against drug use to impresionable adolesents, but these individuals condition is perhaps as much to do with the social implications of their addictions, rather than the drugs themselves. Methamphetamine is a nasty drug, but mildly less harsh amphetamines are widely tolerated. Way too many children diagnosed with attention deficit disorder are fed amphetamines. And, many Dr Kildare types took huge amounts of amphetamines before their use was outlawed back in the 1950's-60's. Of course you then have to asked why they were outlawed then. And, of course you would then have to ask why they are being fed to children now. Other than the occasional stroke or heart attack, infections, hepititis, etc. the biggest significant point may not be taking the drug, but the dose you are taking, and what you have to do (to yourself or others) to get it.

While I have moralistic problems with handing out drugs to addicts, I sometimes wonder if it is less costly to society, and occasionally beneficial to the addict, to do this, as some European countries do.

Dan Tibbets

It is reasonable to use drugs as medicine IF they are selected and administered by those who are trained and authorized to do so.

In this manner, direct control is taken out of the hands of the person being affected by the drug, but they still have indirect control by communicating with their doctor.

Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 5:45 pm
by EricF
I fear my Calculus 2 class may be doing the same thing to me that meth did to those folks. 30+ hours of homework a week is getting old :x

Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 6:35 pm
by rjaypeters
Persevere! It is worth it. Your face will recover, but your mind will not be the same.

Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 6:46 pm
by GIThruster
Drugs does do this to people, but so does smoking, drinking and too much time in the sun.

Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 9:25 pm
by ladajo
I dunno, I'm pretty sure I've never seen a smoker or a beach addict pick holes through their skin seeking imaginary bugs.

Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 9:40 pm
by Skipjack
Rally smoking and to much time in the sun will give you pimpels like that and twist your face into a grimmace that looks like Popeye the sailor?

Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 11:46 pm
by Betruger
What a joke.

Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 3:05 pm
by Diogenes
Another example of what happens when you "self-medicate."



Image