Anti-Colonialism and American foreign policy

Discuss life, the universe, and everything with other members of this site. Get to know your fellow polywell enthusiasts.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

Diogenes
Posts: 6968
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 3:33 pm

Post by Diogenes »

TallDave wrote:
Rorke's Drift proved that superior position and fire discipline in a defensive position can beat 20 to 1 odds, but those sort of defensive odds have been known to be possible for centuries. Not to mention that spears against repeating rifles has never been a contestible fight, not in Africa, not on Pandora...
Actually, the army that besieged the British at Rorke's Drift had already beaten a much larger but less disciplined force earlier that day at Isandlwana, and in fact the Zulus had more rifles than the British but were poorly trained (much like Russian pilots) -- they tended to fire much too high. The position wasn't great either -- they basically had stacks of mealie bags. VDH's Ripples of Battle has a nice recap.
Aircraft carriers are useless if you want to conquer Russia. It is too vast.
They're useful for attacking and for establishing beachheads on the coast, which would be criticial if you wanted a two-front war.

I had to look it up. I had always heard of the event where a small band of British Soldiers held back a massive army of Zulu's, but I didn't know it was called "Rorke's Drift." Found this looking for it. Thought it was amusing.



Image

MSimon
Posts: 14335
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Rockford, Illinois
Contact:

Post by MSimon »

Diogenes wrote:Radar vectored British fighter squadrons to rendezvous with attacking German aircraft. It allowed the British to have the effect of an air force many times larger than it really was. As a matter of fact, the Luftwaffe very much believed the British had a far larger Airforce.

Radar located attack subs in the Atlantic. Britain very nearly lost the war as a result of wolf pack tactics. Without Radar, those subs would have remained active.

Proximity Fuses made allied Anti-Aircraft incredibly deadly. Likewise the Anti-troop bombs and artillery shells which detonated at specified height in the air to scatter fragments down into trenches and behind equipment.

And so on.
Uh. No. As was pointed out: radar was used as cover for Enigma. Here is how it was done: Enigma gave the location.

Radar was then turned on (often a radar the Germans had a fuzz box for).

If the Germans made it back they reported: we were snooped by radar.

In fact attacks on German shipping were required to have an aircraft "spotter" so the Germans wouldn't tumble to an intel break. Or a ruse was used. When Rommel's supplies were hit in a fog the Brits "thanked" Italian "agents" (notional) for their help in a code they knew the Germas could break. The Germans then went on an Italian agent hunt instead of suspecting Enigma.

And the Germans did add wheels during the war. But the Brits built computers at a fast enough rate (and also built faster machines) to keep ahead of the added complexity. It was not just a matter of adding wheels. They then had to distribute the new machines and new procedures. And there was almost always some overlap in time giving the Brits cribs and other hints on how the new machines were wired.
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.

chrismb
Posts: 3161
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 6:00 pm

Post by chrismb »

Aircraft carriers are useless if you want to conquer Russia. It is too vast.
You'd need to go for cutting off the 'head'.

One of the Nimitz class would be perfect to take out the Kremlin...

...just drop one, from 100km high, on top of it (with the reactor running and warheads primed).

djolds1
Posts: 1296
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 8:03 am

Post by djolds1 »

chrismb wrote:One of the Nimitz class would be perfect to take out the Kremlin...

...just drop one, from 100km high, on top of it (with the reactor running and warheads primed).
Like this?

Image

:twisted:
Last edited by djolds1 on Fri Mar 19, 2010 7:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Vae Victis

MSimon
Posts: 14335
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Rockford, Illinois
Contact:

Post by MSimon »

chrismb wrote:
Aircraft carriers are useless if you want to conquer Russia. It is too vast.
You'd need to go for cutting off the 'head'.

One of the Nimitz class would be perfect to take out the Kremlin...

...just drop one, from 100km high, on top of it (with the reactor running and warheads primed).
Not very stealth or very fast.
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.

chrismb
Posts: 3161
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 6:00 pm

Post by chrismb »

MSimon wrote: Not very stealth or very fast.
Neither matter much, if the opposition have no means to stop it and it gets there quicker than they can exit the building and run 100yds.

Great pic!!... exactly as I pictured it. One of my more bizarre comments turned into a visual creation!

djolds1
Posts: 1296
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 8:03 am

Post by djolds1 »

chrismb wrote:
MSimon wrote: Not very stealth or very fast.
Neither matter much, if the opposition have no means to stop it and it gets there quicker than they can exit the building and run 100yds.

Great pic!!... exactly as I pictured it. One of my more bizarre comments turned into a visual creation!
Thank Ronald D. Moore. Battlestar Galactica Season 3 Episode 4, "Exodus, Part 2." See also here.
Vae Victis

CaptainBeowulf
Posts: 498
Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 12:35 am

Post by CaptainBeowulf »

Lol we need to build Battlestars... to use as giant bombs!

Diogenes
Posts: 6968
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 3:33 pm

Post by Diogenes »

MSimon wrote:
Diogenes wrote:Radar vectored British fighter squadrons to rendezvous with attacking German aircraft. It allowed the British to have the effect of an air force many times larger than it really was. As a matter of fact, the Luftwaffe very much believed the British had a far larger Airforce.

Radar located attack subs in the Atlantic. Britain very nearly lost the war as a result of wolf pack tactics. Without Radar, those subs would have remained active.

Proximity Fuses made allied Anti-Aircraft incredibly deadly. Likewise the Anti-troop bombs and artillery shells which detonated at specified height in the air to scatter fragments down into trenches and behind equipment.

And so on.
Uh. No. As was pointed out: radar was used as cover for Enigma. Here is how it was done: Enigma gave the location.

Radar was then turned on (often a radar the Germans had a fuzz box for).

The Chain Home Radar system was turned on and wasn't turned off until it was phased out by Chain Home Low, (and subsequent systems) which were likewise never turned off. Don't know where you got that piece of information, but that is completely and utterly wrong.


MSimon wrote: If the Germans made it back they reported: we were snooped by radar.
Not sure where this came from either. Initially, the Germans didn't know the British were using Radar.
From May to August 1939, the German Zeppelin LZ130 Graf Zeppelin II made flights along Britain's North Sea coast to investigate the 100 m high radio towers the British had erected from Portsmouth to Scapa Flow. LZ130 performed a series of radiometric tests and took photographs. German sources report the 12m Chain Home signals were detected and suspected to be radar; however, the chief investigator was not able to prove his suspicions, so Germany went to war uncertain of British radar defences.[8] Other sources are said to report different results.[9]
MSimon wrote: In fact attacks on German shipping were required to have an aircraft "spotter" so the Germans wouldn't tumble to an intel break. Or a ruse was used. When Rommel's supplies were hit in a fog the Brits "thanked" Italian "agents" (notional) for their help in a code they knew the Germas could break. The Germans then went on an Italian agent hunt instead of suspecting Enigma.
This simply demonstrates the Usefulness of cracking enigma. No one is arguing that it wasn't useful. We are arguing which was the most valuable weapon system.

MSimon wrote: And the Germans did add wheels during the war. But the Brits built computers at a fast enough rate (and also built faster machines) to keep ahead of the added complexity. It was not just a matter of adding wheels. They then had to distribute the new machines and new procedures. And there was almost always some overlap in time giving the Brits cribs and other hints on how the new machines were wired.
From memory, I recall reading that Donitz insisted that his subs have an Extra Wheel on their Enigma machines. For this reason, it was much later that the Submarine messages were successfully decoded.

In any case, an intercepted message will give you an approximate position, (probably no better than radio triangulation in the first place.) not nearly good enough for destroying the target. Radar gives an exact position where depth charges can be dropped.


Long Metal Objects floating in water are HUGE radar targets , especially from Aircraft. They are highly visible even when submerged to some depth.

Intercepted messages won't find a single submerged submarine. Radar would and did.

Skipjack
Posts: 6817
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm

Post by Skipjack »

There were a few mistakes in regards to the navy that were made by Hitler that may have very well cost him the Victory against the British.
He put more value into large Battleships than into submarines. He did not want to diverge planes from the war against england to aide the submarines in the Atlantic. The subs had a really hard time spotting convoys and they were were woundable by British airplanes that could drop waterbombs and call in anti submarine ships in the vicinity.
Another mistake was the German insistance on developing a long wave radar due to its superior reach. Those things were way to large to be practically put onto smaller vessels and planes. The British were smart and developed a short range radar, that basically works until the horizon, but from a high flying plane that is still a very nice distance. It allowed their Liberator bombers to spot otherwise hard to detect surfaced submarines even in unfavorable weather conditions, often before the German submarine crews were able to detect the planes.
Again, diverting some planes from Goerings battle against England to Doenitz' submarines might have helped a bit there.
Anyway, there were quite a few mistakes that the German leadership made. Hitler most of all. He was, like many dictators, putting to much value on drama than actual use. I believe that Saddam never had and weapons of mass destruction (after he was disarmed). He just played his stupid game with the Un controlers for the drama and to keep his face in front of his people. As a dictator, you are always on the ejection seat. Once people think you are weak, you are gone.

Diogenes
Posts: 6968
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 3:33 pm

Post by Diogenes »

Skipjack wrote:There were a few mistakes in regards to the navy that were made by Hitler that may have very well cost him the Victory against the British.
He put more value into large Battleships than into submarines. He did not want to diverge planes from the war against england to aide the submarines in the Atlantic. The subs had a really hard time spotting convoys and they were were woundable by British airplanes that could drop waterbombs and call in anti submarine ships in the vicinity.
Another mistake was the German insistance on developing a long wave radar due to its superior reach. Those things were way to large to be practically put onto smaller vessels and planes. The British were smart and developed a short range radar, that basically works until the horizon, but from a high flying plane that is still a very nice distance. It allowed their Liberator bombers to spot otherwise hard to detect surfaced submarines even in unfavorable weather conditions, often before the German submarine crews were able to detect the planes.
Again, diverting some planes from Goerings battle against England to Doenitz' submarines might have helped a bit there.
Anyway, there were quite a few mistakes that the German leadership made. Hitler most of all. He was, like many dictators, putting to much value on drama than actual use. I believe that Saddam never had and weapons of mass destruction (after he was disarmed). He just played his stupid game with the Un controlers for the drama and to keep his face in front of his people. As a dictator, you are always on the ejection seat. Once people think you are weak, you are gone.
I saw a story the other day on the Military channel in this vein. Apparently Goering was very uncooperative with Doenitz, and resented using aircraft to help the navy. The only exception to this was Goering's use of Aircraft to attack allied ships.

You are likewise correct about Hitler's infatuation with Surface ships, when his efforts would have been far more effective in boosting the submarine fleets. The Germans had the leading technology in submarines, but were not particularly remarkable in surface ships. The exception being the "Pocket Battleships" like the Graff Spee. The ship could outrun anything too big for it to fight, and kill anything else which was fast enough to catch it.

Captain Langsdorff demonstrated just how effective such a ship could be.

MSimon
Posts: 14335
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Rockford, Illinois
Contact:

Post by MSimon »

The Chain Home Radar system was turned on and wasn't turned off until it was phased out by Chain Home Low, (and subsequent systems) which were likewise never turned off. Don't know where you got that piece of information, but that is completely and utterly wrong.
Bodyguard of Lies

And my other studies of Code Breaking in WW2.

Same for the rest of the points you mentioned.

There were two types of radar (in the main). Meter wavelengths and cm wavelengths. The Germans had fuzz boxes for the meter wave radars.

And of course they never turned off the radar. The hadn't broken the Russian codes.
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.

MSimon
Posts: 14335
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Rockford, Illinois
Contact:

Post by MSimon »

Long Metal Objects floating in water are HUGE radar targets , especially from Aircraft. They are highly visible even when submerged to some depth.
Some one neglected to notify the Japanese. They often flew right over American fleets and totally missed them.

OTOH they excelled at night work from ships with binoculars. They often saw the American fleets visually before the Americans spotted the Japanese by radar.
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.

Diogenes
Posts: 6968
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 3:33 pm

Post by Diogenes »

MSimon wrote:
The Chain Home Radar system was turned on and wasn't turned off until it was phased out by Chain Home Low, (and subsequent systems) which were likewise never turned off. Don't know where you got that piece of information, but that is completely and utterly wrong.
Bodyguard of Lies

And my other studies of Code Breaking in WW2.

Same for the rest of the points you mentioned.

There were two types of radar (in the main). Meter wavelengths and cm wavelengths. The Germans had fuzz boxes for the meter wave radars.

And of course they never turned off the radar. The hadn't broken the Russian codes.
Well, see there, That's the problem. We're reading different books! :)
The INVENTION THAT CHANGED THE WORLD: HOW A SMALL GROUP OF RADAR PIONEERS WON THE SECOND WORLD WAR AND LAUNCHED A TECH

http://www.amazon.com/INVENTION-THAT-CH ... 0684835290

Diogenes
Posts: 6968
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 3:33 pm

Post by Diogenes »

MSimon wrote:
Long Metal Objects floating in water are HUGE radar targets , especially from Aircraft. They are highly visible even when submerged to some depth.
Some one neglected to notify the Japanese. They often flew right over American fleets and totally missed them.

OTOH they excelled at night work from ships with binoculars. They often saw the American fleets visually before the Americans spotted the Japanese by radar.
Japanese radars during the war sucked. I'm not sure if the Japanese even put radar on aircraft, but their Ship radar was simply outclassed by ours.

Post Reply