The IPCC has a few troubling reports

[MSimon]

http://climatequotes.com/2010/02/01/ipc ... operators/

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/01/31/a ... e-concern/

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/01/30/g ... e-article/
The magazine cites the IPCC - the IPCC cites the magazine. Solid science that.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/01/29/u ... ier-issue/
Pachauri lied. His budget went up.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/01/29/n ... -ipcc-ar4/
The IPCC uses only unbiased sources. Just ask them.


====

Not IPCC

Coral dying from cold - climate change!
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/01/31/n ... tent-data/

They faked data from China. McIntyre reported three years ago.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2 ... es-chinese

http://climateaudit.org/2007/02/26/phil ... p-forward/

===

The release of the e-mails does not invalidate the science. But investigation seems to be turning up more and more dodgy bits.

It is early days yet. Hardly 3 months in. It will get worse.

But Pachauri evidently is planning for his next career.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/01/30/i ... nce-novel/

[Josh Cryer]

Pachauri should have never been involved in anything scientific. Unfortunately when you are compiling a lot of scientific data you need a manager to get it done.