...and justice for all ?
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:35 pm
How do you prove someone is guilty when they are not ? This issue is one of my favorite whipping boys. Why do we put up with abuses by Prosecutors ?
If they committed their abuses as Prosecutors they are immuned, but if they committed their abuses as Investigators they are personally liable? What, do they have a hat they can switch on and off or something ?
If people don't hate and detest the current legal system and lawyers, it is because they really don't understand it well enough. (or they are just evil people.)
http://reason.com/blog/2010/01/05/12-mi ... -a-supreme
The issue before the Court, which heard the case in November, was whether Richter and Hrvol committed these abuses in their roles as prosecutors, in which case longstanding precedent would make them immune from lawsuits, or in their roles as investigators, in which case they could be held personally liable. The $12 million settlement by the prosecutors and the county suggests they feared the Court would reach the latter conclusion.
If they committed their abuses as Prosecutors they are immuned, but if they committed their abuses as Investigators they are personally liable? What, do they have a hat they can switch on and off or something ?
If people don't hate and detest the current legal system and lawyers, it is because they really don't understand it well enough. (or they are just evil people.)
http://reason.com/blog/2010/01/05/12-mi ... -a-supreme